Only if they had been concerned about not offending the delicate sensibilities of the Democrats.
2007-06-20 12:45:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Today's Republicans would have been loyalists (supporting the British) back then, but there was no fighting at the Boston Tea Party -- you mean the American Revolution. Please pay better attention in history class, you are making our side look bad, especially with those additional comments. That and your screen name is telling me you are 14 and don't study very hard.
2007-06-20 19:50:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was no fighting at the Boston Tea Party. Learn how to read, then do some.
2007-06-20 19:48:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Farly the Seer 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
There was no fighting in the Boston Tea Party.
I understand that you are trying to discredit republicans, but at least try to learn the history before trying to use in as an example.
2007-06-20 19:45:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"fought in the Boston Tea Party" lol
2007-06-20 19:45:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Granny Gruntz 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
no. The british would be under our control because after we had dumped all their tea, we would have gone over there and destroyed the whole country looking for weapons of mass destruction. :)
2007-06-20 19:47:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by jen81076 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wasn't it President Carter who said the Revolutionary War was unnecessary, the British just should of been nice.
2007-06-20 19:46:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dina W 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
They would pretend to be indians and throw tea overboard..No one seems to realize that the idea was to blame that act on the indians. Only it didn't work.
(humm. wasn't exactly a fight though)
2007-06-20 19:50:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's not forget that they don't talk to people they don't like, so we would never be allowed to drink tea either.
2007-06-20 19:49:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by daBreezemeister 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm... Boston Masscare you mean?
2007-06-20 19:46:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ibid 3
·
1⤊
0⤋