It is the only way to insure that under a militarily operated democracy/Republic that we have enough troops to defend an Empire .
2007-06-20 09:29:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I say bring back the draft.
2007-06-20 09:33:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i don't think it will come back under the current circumstances. If Congress would fund it, I'm sure the military could raise another division or two, just lower standards a little.
Too many people still have a bad taste in their mouth from the last time we used the draft.
2007-06-20 16:35:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the public will not tolerate a war that requires a draft unless it is absolutely vital
we would have to be attacked by an established country on our own soil
I doubt that will happen anytime soon
I think that if Bush pushed for a draft he would be impeached within weeks
2007-06-20 16:35:32 · answer #3 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that we need to stick with the current system of a voluntary military. That's the way it is now and it is working. Why force people to fight for something that they don't believe in. I don't want to give the liberals anymore fuel to place on their anti-war fire.
2007-06-21 13:51:59 · answer #4 · answered by fire_side_2003 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There already is a back-door draft in effect with extended tours and rotations to Iraq.
2007-06-20 16:34:05 · answer #5 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Conservative chickenhawks dont want a draft SO: No draft!
2007-06-20 16:37:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stem cell research is immoral and illegal,butt using a government supplied weapon is not?
2007-06-20 16:37:31 · answer #7 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So, you took the name "trouble maker" because "troll" was already taken?
2007-06-20 16:33:21 · answer #8 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
bring it back now...zero exemptions
2007-06-20 16:36:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋