what do u guys think of digital art and technology? is it better or worse then old art from the 1900s
2007-06-20 08:59:12 · 5 answers · asked by just me 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
art is capturing imagination or life on paper....it could be drawing, pianting, singing, dance, acting etc...it is a way of expressing oneself.
2007-06-20 09:31:37 · answer #1 · answered by Shaneka H 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's not like the classic arts, painting, photography, sculpture, are going anywhere. They can co-exist, one is not really better than the other, it's up to what medium the artist likes to use. I studied art in college, I am an artist that likes to do all of them. Somedays I want to paint, others, maybe get out and take some photos, some days use Photoshop, some days I want to get my hands into some clay. If you continue to do one single thing you get stagnant.
2007-06-20 16:07:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I too side with the answerer that said that Art is in the eye
of the beholder.This doesnt apply to Art history (and its authors).
2007-06-20 22:25:07 · answer #3 · answered by peter m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
art is in the eye of the beholder.
My art teacher didnt buy that and i got a felling you dont either
2007-06-20 16:08:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
better. either that or the same. its hard to compare, there so different. they're both creative so i like them both.=)
2007-06-20 18:11:41 · answer #5 · answered by stargirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋