It was downright stupid. Instead of lending money to Germany and Austria and creating a common market, the allies first imposed a barely bearable combination of reparations and contributions on Germany, then restricted its international trade.
Read "The Economic Consequences of the Peace" by J.M. Keynes and note how much what Keynes proposed to do in 1919 looks like what has actually been done between 1945 and 1955...
2007-06-20 08:03:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by NC 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Versailles was infamous for its unfair treatment of Germany and the German people.
First of all, Germany did not start WWI. It had nothing to do with the start of the first world war and yet the Treaty of Versailles punished Germany more severely than the other nations, Austria and Serbia, which actually started the fracus in the first place.
http://www.johndclare.net/peace_treaties4.htm
Clause 231 was unjust and wrong and left resentment on the German populace for decades to come, in fact the Treaty of Versaille, specifically clause 231, was blamed for the rise of nationalism in the Weimar Republic.
2007-06-20 07:55:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hindsight is a superb element and, with the earnings of this, maximum folk could say it grew to become into harsh and, ultimately, unwise. worldwide conflict 2 grew to become into probably an instantaneous consequence of the treaty with its requirement for territory concessions and reparation, which for sure angered the German people as they neither felt to blame for commencing the conflict, nor did they sense as though that they were overwhelmed. The French, British and individuals would desire to no longer agree between them what they actually needed from the treaty and the end result grew to become into particularly a mix of the worst factors, fairly than a "peace treaty". possible, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, understand the will of the allies for some style of repayment from the German united states of america for the shortcoming of existence and recompense for the huge expenditure in contact.
2016-09-28 04:32:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Extremely harsh on the Germans and unwise. It caused a lot of anger with the Germans. Hitler took advantage of this and you know where that led.
2007-06-20 08:48:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by SgtMoto 6
·
2⤊
0⤋