English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=scalia+defends+jack+bauer&fr=ush-ans

"Senior judges from North America and Europe were in the midst of a panel discussion about torture and terrorism law, when a Canadian judge's passing remark - "Thankfully, security agencies in all our countries do not subscribe to the mantra 'What would Jack Bauer do?' " - got the legal bulldog in Judge Scalia barking"

"Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?" Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. "Say that criminal law is against him? 'You have the right to a jury trial?' Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don't think so.

2007-06-20 07:37:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

sorry about the wrongly sourced submission on my part..thanks...

Judge Scalia is an Associate Judge

2007-06-20 07:49:06 · update #1

sorry about the wrongly sourced submission on my part..thanks...

Judge Scalia is an Associate Judge

2007-06-20 07:49:07 · update #2

6 answers

Bout time somebody grew a pair in Washington besides Bush. By the way, Roberts is the chief Justice, not Scalia.

2007-06-20 07:41:20 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 0 1

a rapid stick to-as much as Friday’s submit: Obama “Birther” Orly Taitz did certainly confront chief Justice John Roberts at a communicate board on the college of Idaho-Moscow. From the Seattle submit-Intelligencer: At one element during the objective audience question era, Orly Taitz, a woman from Rancho Santa Margarita, Calif., reported she had data proving that President Obama replaced into not born interior america and for that reason might desire to not be president. on an identical time as aim audience individuals laughed, she reported she had a million/2 a million signatures of persons stressful the ideally suited courtroom hear the situation. Roberts decrease her off via asserting that if she had data along with her, she ought to supply them to protection officers. He additionally reported he might desire to not communicate the situation. =========================== NO. Taitz CLAIMS what she thinks Roberts reported. Lies unfold like wildfire. and she or he's mendacity. every person with a million/third an oz.. of expertise? Any choose who reads any checklist given to him, exterior of a courtroom, concerning to any case it somewhat is pending or could be pending.. could be far flung from the bench. Her action in this occasion verge on criminal, a minimum of sufficient to get her disbarred. of path, permit me bypass decrease back and count quantity... how a lot of you're TOO UNEDUCATED to realize WHAT SHE DID? AND WHY that's prohibited?

2016-12-08 14:42:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I have no sympathy for terrorists.. Torture the heck out of them!! Jack Bauer gets the job done... and yes, I know it's fiction... but that doesn't mean it doesn't work. Terrorists don't deserve compassion, and we should not allow them the pleasure. If they have information that is crucial to the country's safety, we need to do what needs to be done to obtain that information, not what is politically correct.

2007-06-20 14:01:15 · answer #3 · answered by wallflower♪ 5 · 1 0

if they are a known terrorist, or potentially know information that will save innocent lives, torture the hell out of them. i dont care what they have to do. if they end up not knowing anything, or wont admit to it, at least you tried. better than coddling them and having innocent people killed

2007-06-20 08:05:56 · answer #4 · answered by Scott J 2 · 1 0

I wish they all would treat terrorist like Jack Bauer does, then we would be rid of most all of them!!!!

2007-06-20 13:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by pollywog 6 · 1 0

Sometimes you have to get your hands dirty to save millions of lives.

I would rather torture a terrorist than have my family murdered.

2007-06-20 07:48:02 · answer #6 · answered by Sleeck 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers