English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Its a hard pick between Giuliani and Hillary. But at least Hilldog doesn't have quite the taste for blood that Giuliani has. Guiliani scares me the most. During the last debate he suggested that our troops need to learn nation building skills. That concept scares the bejesus out of me.

2007-06-20 07:11:18 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

36 answers

Hillary Clinton

2007-06-20 07:13:52 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 5 5

The scariest candidates are the right-wing nutjobs like Tancredo and Hunter. Being a Creationist should make you ineligible for the US presidency.

The scariest candidates with a chance of winning are Romney and Giuliani. Giuliani is a pro-big business police state war monger who was very unpopular in NYC prior to 9/11, then he sent people into an unsafe breathing atmosphere in the days afterward.

Romney scares me because he'll say anything to get nominated. In 1994 he claimed to be more pro-gay rights than Ted Kennedy. Now he claims he's some kind of ideal conservative. He's a complete fake.

Of the Democrats Hillary scares me the most because she can't admit when she's wrong, and Bush has shown how dangerous that quality can be in a president.

2007-06-20 07:32:31 · answer #2 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2 0

How does Guilani have a taste for blood? We rebuilt Germany and Japan after WW2, and Giuliani wants soldiers to know how to rebuild Iraq. Anyway, Hillary scares me the most, but she's only talked about doing things, never actually doing them, so we don't have to worry that much.

2007-06-20 07:18:04 · answer #3 · answered by steelersfan2010 2 · 2 1

Hillary.

2007-06-20 07:59:09 · answer #4 · answered by P.J. 1 · 2 0

Hands down it's Hillary

2007-06-20 07:49:17 · answer #5 · answered by egg_sammash 5 · 2 0

Hillary totally destroys her and Bill's enemies. Beyond any shadow of a doubt, Hillary is the most scary candidate because nothing is out of bounds when she's on the attack, any dirty trick, lie, deceit is fair game for this woman.

2007-06-20 07:21:43 · answer #6 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 2 1

Definitely Giuliani... the fact that he promised the U.S. would be attacked if a Democrat took office.... I took that as a threat.

Another 9/11 could be too easily engineered.

2007-06-20 07:19:04 · answer #7 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 3 1

Hillary.

2007-06-20 07:18:43 · answer #8 · answered by Frank Dileo 3 · 4 1

Any and all liberals scare me. Obama, Clinton, Edwards, and -yes- Giuliani. With each one of them it's "six in one hand; a half dozen in the other."
Do you want homosexual marriage (oxymoron, though it may be)? Do you want to invite terrorist organizations to the table (or maybe it's the couch) to "talk" about their bad feeling for Israel and the US? Do you want to fund "programs" to fix every societal ill you can name? Well, if you don't, don't vote liberal.
HELLO!

2007-06-20 08:10:51 · answer #9 · answered by fruitypebbles 4 · 1 1

Giulliani has no experience . A man that cheated on his wife and so forth is no better .
I trust Hillary to do the job just fine . May the best one win and keep the promisses they make.

2007-06-20 07:15:37 · answer #10 · answered by silverearth1 7 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers