2007-06-20 06:10:49 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Rudy, but not by much.
As for the answer about Rudy supporting the war in Iraq...so does Hillary...no she doesn't...yes she does...no she doesn't...wait what day is it? I forgot if she is for or against, TODAY!
2007-06-20 06:15:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Neither. This is a forced upon us early election season to do just that, make it appear we have no choices. Watch polls that are deceptive at best. Run against the current President by bashing his handling of his time in office. So we really have no hard choices do we?
There is alot of time between Nov 2008 and just now Summer 2007. There will be more surprises.
May I dare make a prediction?
Ticket
Dem- Clinton/ Obama
Rep-McCain/ Guiliani ? or visa versa
Independant-Bloomberg/Thompson
Educated guess. They will hook up be sure of it.
Who goes where is a crap shoot.
In that case I will be voting Independent. Usually I would caution against it as it swings votes and could backfire.
Not in this case, two experienced, educated wealthy men on their own wings & not bullying up funds? Change is just what we say we want. Clinton can not offer that. Neither can the Republicans at this point. Like I said there is alot of time for alot of surprises. Exposing the Clinton's is another derailment. Many have tried. They will try harder now.
Thanks alot for your time.
2007-06-20 06:28:55 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton
2007-06-20 06:28:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would vote for either Ron Paul or Mike Gravel. I'm a registered Democrat but I like both of those candidates because they're the ones that make the most sense and seem to want to steer this country in a different direction. We need politicians who put the needs of American citizens first, second and 3rd, not politicians who support the needs of another certain country and collect money from the A.I.PA.C. Besides, I wouldn't vote for any man who would dress up in women's clothes and I heard that madame.........oooops, I mean Rudy did that before.
2007-06-20 06:18:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither of them but since they are the only 2 choices. I would say Hillary. I would of voted for Rudy about 3 months ago but ever since I have been listening to this guy on debates and such no way would he get my vote.
2007-06-20 06:14:53 · answer #5 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Lets see Hillary wants to have total control with the people having no rights. We would be an active part of the north American union in the first year with no more sovertngy or borders or bill of rights. Within 2 years we would be another Mexico complete with poverty and corruption.
Now with Gulliani he would be sure his gangster friends would have all the key contracts implementing the north American union and would probably have us being another Mexico within 2 years complete with all the poverty and coruption.
Wow now is that a choice or what!
How about voting for someone who isn't a big part of the problem! A person who don't lie, respects and supports the constitution.
Dr. Ron Paul for president 2008!
2007-06-20 06:28:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Rudy, As mayor of N.Y., he wasn't well liked, but 9/11 aside, he made N.Y.ers proud or at least less ashamed to be N.Y.ers. If he can do that to America, we need him more then we know. Besides, Hillary panders too much. I have no respect for that.
2007-06-20 06:26:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hillary.
2007-06-20 06:20:10 · answer #8 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Rudy. I am voting against Hillary with these choices.
2007-06-20 06:14:29 · answer #9 · answered by Reported for insulting my belief 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hillary, but only because Rudy supports the war in Iraq
2007-06-20 06:13:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋