Like for example, you wish it would turn out differently even though you know it won't.
For me, it's A league of Their Own where at the end Dottie drops the ball so Kit can win, and also I just saw Open Water 2 and if you've seen it, you know what i mean by frustrating!
2007-06-20 05:41:45 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Titanic always annoyed me. Did anyone else every think if Rose had stayed on that one life boat, then Jack could have floated on that piece of furniture? Or if she had just moved over? or if they had taken turns??? Then they both could have lived.
The end of the Departed I wish had turned out a little different. Although Donny Walberg then comes in and makes it all worth wild.
2007-06-20 05:47:34 · answer #1 · answered by marah p 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. I know! I can't believe they didn't include Peeves. His parts in the books made me laugh so hard I cried! Did they really cast Rik Myall in the part? I didn't know that, but, believe it or not, I always imagined Peeves to look and act just like him! 2. This didn't really bother me. I mean, I noticed it but it was never a big issue with me. It's not like it annoys me every time I watch the movies. I suppose the characters couldn't wear cloaks/robes all the time, the only other option is muggle clothes. 3. Yes, this is one of the scenes that they left out that really pissed me off. Another was the feast in the first book when everyone is singing the school song (to their ow tune of course). Fred and George are the last ones left singing as they are singing the song as a slow funeral march and Dumbledore conducts their last few bars with his wand. 4. It would have been nice to see Nick;s deathday party but I think a Monty Python reunion would have ruined the 'whole other world' feel Harry Potter has going on. 5. Yes, Grawp did not act at all like the Grawp from the books. He was so cute when he said HAGGARD and HERMY. It was such an easy thing to do, to have someone voice him, I wish they had. 6. The second guy to play Dumbledore is just a little off. I think we only notice it because we are hardcore Harry Potter fans, whereas a lot of others wouldn't realize. But yes, his portrayal of Dumbledore is not quite right. I heard somewhere that the actor has never even read the books. It's no wonder he sucks. How hard is it to read the books of the movie you are starring in s you can get your character right! 7. I know! In the earlier movies they left out a few key details but in some of the latter movies they left out entire chunks of plot! Seriously, I watched the fifth movie with my mum (who has never read the books) and I had to keep explaining what was going on since the movie had left so much out that it didn't een make sense! 8. Mhmmm. They have the characters doing all sorts of things that they can't actually do in the books. 9. I haven't seen Slughorn in any scenes, but I have seen pictures. You are right, he doesn't look like he is described in the books. It's annoying! 10. The seventh movies will probablynot be all that great, just like none of the others were that great. But at least it is going to be double the time to get the story right. Order of the Phoenix was the longest book, right? And they left so much out of that movie. Hopefully they can fit all that is important into the two part Deathly Hallows. Another thing that bugs me is they left out SPEW. The movies mention nothing about Hermione's campaign for House-elf rights, so what are they going to do in the Ron/Hermione kiss scene? Hermione kisses Ron because he finally understands what she's been going on about with the whole SPEW and whatnot. They have completely screwed tat scene already and it hasn't even been filmed. Also, Harry's eyes are green, G-R-E-E-N! It bugs me so much that they use Daniel Radcliffe's blue eyes! I mean why can't they just change them digitally or have him wear contacts!? I thought the first three movies were okay, the fourth was worse and the fifth was godawful! I will still go to see the remaining movies as soon as the come out at the cinema and I do like them, simply because I love anything Harry Potter related. But I do think that they are been buggered up in places and could have been so much better.
2016-05-20 22:15:09 · answer #2 · answered by dale 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"The 40 Year Old Virgin". It was so funny throughout the movie, but had such a lame ending. Also, "Gone With The Wind". I wanted Rhett and Scarlett to get back together and live happily ever after. Their little girl died and that was Soooo sad.
2007-06-20 05:47:15 · answer #3 · answered by onebigfool 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
usually when things end badly i enjoy it. A good example of this is the movie "Arlington Road." What a great twist ending. You really enjoy the ending.
I guess i get really depressed at the end of "Requiem for a Dream." But if it didnt depress me it wouldnt have succeeded, so again, I like that it accomplished its goal.
2007-06-20 05:46:58 · answer #4 · answered by wolfatthedoor 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wish that City of Angels had turned out differently. It was such an awesome movie and then the ending just had to screw it up! So sad!
2007-06-20 06:35:01 · answer #5 · answered by Marsha 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A Walk To Remember :)
2007-06-20 05:46:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The movie Colors frustrates me. I would have let the cop (main character) live.
2007-06-20 05:44:58 · answer #7 · answered by Faye 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"West Side Story". I wish Tony lived and that he and Maria married and had a nice, quiet little life together and have kids. Sigh... but it is not to be.
2007-06-20 05:55:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
AH! The end of It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad World stinks. Spencer Tracy should have gotten away with the money and made a new life for himself. He should have won.
2007-06-20 05:44:29 · answer #9 · answered by Lady Ettejin of Wern 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hiedie, cause no one listens to what the little girl is saying and no one listens to the grampa.
2007-06-20 05:44:59 · answer #10 · answered by bongobeat25 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋