Check the following question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070620083741AAVYZuK&r=w&pa=FZptHWf.BGRX3OFMiTZWVY3y4lnrZlZDFCmdIzUqGojJ1ZctlxkRZ9QUFvkTffgAcA1mBTPFp40muukNTw--&paid=answered#RZcsX2S8Vjcv9ccfz0VGGJTmyzS0qZbfHvcQ1jHuYj9ZdncEPbLZ
Can in theory one increase the relativistic mass of a flywheel by spinning it, thereby increasing its gravitational field?
2007-06-20
05:10:57
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Scythian1950
7
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Physics
To those referring to centripedal or centrifugal forces, let's just imagine that the flywheel is enclosed, so it's just a black box. Now, can you create gravitational pull with it, like artificial gravity in Star Trek? That's why the question is a relativisitc one.
2007-06-20
05:26:49 ·
update #1
Goring, one way for a starship to "produce gravity" is to bring along a lot of mass, which is impractical. Another is to bring in "relativistic mass" in the form of energy, which can be flywheel energy? Certainly it ought to be more compact, and can be installed before flight. Just throwing out ideas here, folks.
2007-06-20
05:33:03 ·
update #2
Uncle Al, interesting stuff, but none of them involve relativistic increase in mass of the spinning disk. What if, for example, instead of using a flywheel, I use a toy train on a rectangular track, and made the train go near the speed of light? Would the toy train, on the straights, exert gravitational force because of its increased relativistic mass?
2007-06-20
06:38:17 ·
update #3
eyeonthescreen, I agree that using an actual flywheel will be impractical for this, I wanted to hear the relativistic arguments, because there are other ways of doing this. Flywheels are just easy to visualize.
2007-06-20
08:18:31 ·
update #4