English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't think we need another actor to be a PR man for corporate America.

2007-06-20 05:03:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Over about two decades of lobbying, Fred Thompson represented clients including Haitian Presidente Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Canadian-owned cable companies and a British reinsurance company.[13]

From 1975 to 1992 Thompson worked as a lobbyist in Washington, D.C. representing such clients as Westinghouse, General Electric (the current corporate owner of the NBC Universal-NBC television network), and the Tennessee Savings and Loan League

2007-06-20 05:05:32 · update #1

I am not ignorant to that fact Ryan.

2007-06-20 05:18:50 · update #2

11 answers

Yet another Neocon...a great example of how the neocons have hijacked the party...all of the real conservatives...Huckabee, Brownback, are trailing horribly, while Guliani, Romney, and Thompson, all of which used to be pro-choice a few years ago, are leading the pack....this ain't your father's Republican party. This is why I left the party after Reagan

2007-06-20 05:09:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I have to say you must be ignorant of the fact that many prominent members of the left including former Presidents Carter and Clinton, and Presidential candidates Clinton and Edwards are members of the Council on Foreign Relations. John Kerry is also a member.

2007-06-20 12:13:16 · answer #2 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 0 1

I like his stance on the issues and he has the record as senator to prove it... yes he was a lobbyist and a good actor.. Is that all you got?.

Most everyone on capital hill were crooked blood sucking Lawyers.. whats your point?

2007-06-20 12:07:50 · answer #3 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 2 1

he is more qualified than half of the reps and most of the dems. and to say ronnie was anything but a good president is dead wrong. history has told us different and to not acknowledge that is being blind. fred is likely to win the whole thing because america wants a conservative president and the majority of america is conservative. better fred than dead.

2007-06-20 12:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 1 2

lets not forget that before Fred was into acting, he was an active politician. too bad Obama, cannot say that.

2007-06-20 12:06:42 · answer #5 · answered by Random Black Woman 6 · 4 1

Yeah, that's it, only those two reasons. It couldn't possibly be anything else. Are you really that naive?

2007-06-20 12:08:22 · answer #6 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1 1

He's getting to you,huh. Good! Go Fred!

2007-06-20 12:05:52 · answer #7 · answered by melanie 3 · 5 2

Ah,poor baby wants his corrupt mama,Hillary.

2007-06-20 12:06:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

They want another Reagan wannabe.

2007-06-20 12:05:43 · answer #9 · answered by cynical 6 · 2 3

you seem to worried about his chances . . .

2007-06-20 12:09:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers