If the Surge in Iraq Do'es not work should the U.S. pull out and then Bomb Iraq,Syria and Iran?

Question

When I say Bomb I mean Bomb them back to the Dark Ages.

Answer 1

sure-thats what will make the 'conservative' so-called 'christian' right happy. they love to murder people for the sake of power,greed , and sheer sadism.

Answer 2

So if your war plan (or lack thereof) fails and every subsequent action taken to accommodate that fact also fails, then you suggest bombing and destabilizing the entire region?

Your suggestion falls into the "not so bright" category.

BTW - To suggest twe bomb them into the "Dark Ages" is very ironic, considering it was only the Europeans who ever were in the Dark Ages. During those times, the Arabs were highly advanced and if it weren't for them, then much of Greek and Roman knowledge would have been lost, including such things as Algebra, and Geometry.

By the way, how do you like your Arabic numerals? When you were in the Dark Ages, other cultures were actually progressing...

Answer 3

If American troops leave there will be no need to bomb them back to where they already are, the one thing that keeps the entire region from destroying it self(the USA) will be gone and they will annihilate each other.

Answer 4

I don't think that a nuclear attack on those countries listed is a realistic response to the problems in the region.

Answer 5

Iran, Syria and the Gaza Strip will do for starters, but the Democrats won't allow it, so lets pay someone with some GUTS, like Israel, to do it for us.

Answer 6

nope , that would fix the problem way to fast and be way to easy , we should just sit around and complain until all of our soldiers are gone

Answer 7

AIPAC says bomb everybody.......

Answer 8

with out doubt . . .

iran wants nukes we should oblige