"There is virtually no performance difference between the 64MB and 128MB versions of the Go7400; TurboCache shared memory compensates for the relatively small amount of video memory on the 64MB version quite well."
IS THIS TRUE? AND IT ALSO APPLIES FOR 7300GO?
I have read this here:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=39568
Also, it writes:
"Nvidia's [shared memory technology] is superior, as part of it is done in hardware; ATI's solution relies completely on software and is considerably slower."
I want to buy an Acer laptop with Nvidia Go7300 64Mb because it has a Dual Core 1.73 Ghz T2080 CPU with 2Mb L2, 667 Mhz FSB.
There is an another too, with 128Mb Nvidia Go7300, BUT it has a slower Dual Core 1.73 Ghz T2080 CPU with 1Mb L2, and 533 FSB...
If the two cards have relatively the same performance, then the 1st one would be faster...
And I want to know if it is a good decision...
Please help me.
Thanks.
2007-06-20
03:46:19
·
3 answers
·
asked by
vetko
1
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Hardware
➔ Laptops & Notebooks
Yes, but the shared memory does not compensates the dedicated memory difference?
And on the slower CPU won't the games run slower?
2007-06-20
03:58:43 ·
update #1
By the way, the card with 128 Mb memory is only DDR, while with the 64 MB is GDDR2...
2007-06-20
04:05:10 ·
update #2