if it was, at least it would make a profit
2007-06-20 03:37:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by gerafalop 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
actual it is greater appropriate than government care. because of the fact the article notes, Walmart is increasing their possibilities--they have had this in seventy seven shops already. they are partnering with respected clinics and hospitals to artwork stress the clinics, so what's the undertaking? in case you do no longer think of this is sufficient, then you definately are indicting the government because of the fact they have standards for the MD, DO, RN, etc. and you will could desire to declare that those standards are inadequate IF the folk artwork in a Walmart health center. On what foundation might that be genuine? all of us know what happens with "unfastened" well-being care with the aid of UHC--it is rationed--anybody is instructed they do no longer seem to be worth treating. The structures circulate bankrupt. With Walmart, people will pay a real looking cost for high quality care and for the traditional man or woman this is all they want--maximum anybody isn't heavily unwell.
2016-11-07 00:45:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by piazza 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the government were run like Wal-Mart, the USA would not be like it is right now, it would not be in the big debt it is in right now, it would not be in the mess it is right now! I disagree with all those who say that Wal-Mart is no good, it is probably the best store in the world, it is a world wide corporation, and defiantly, the people who handle the company know what they are doing. The world would defiantly be a better place if they were run by people who think like the Wal-Mart big cheeses.
2007-06-20 07:09:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Star Gazer 88 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I suppose it is only a matter of time before the government becomes a corporation...or becomes the wholly-owned subsidiary of a corporation. Either way, the day-to-day lives of average citizens won't change much.
I concur, though--it would be a breath of fresh air to cut government waste and really trim the budget.
2007-06-20 03:43:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mathsorcerer 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am not a fan of Walmart. The stores are dirty and the service is terrible. I have begun to find that better quality stores like Target have very similar prices and have better service.
Run the country like Target.
2007-06-20 03:38:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Stylish One 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I agree 100%. Imagine a fat slob like Ted Kennedy getting whipped into shape by a manager who demands accountability.
2007-06-20 03:39:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by RP McMurphy 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
it should be run much more efficiently, yes but we dont need a greater at fed buildings who ought to be retired and fishing
2007-06-20 03:53:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't they already. Those at the top give themselves big salaries, perks, health care for life, golden parachutes, while those at the bottom get minimum wages, no health cares, and are worked to death.
2007-06-20 03:40:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by jean 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
YOU'RE DEFENDING WAL-MART! ARE YOU INSANE!!!
Walmart SUCKS!
Try going in to walmart to buy alcohol/tobacco and if you're accompanied by someone under the age they wont sell it to YOU!!!Even though you're purchasing! silly isnt it!
-----"All customers appearing to be under the age of 40 will be asked to provide proof of age by showing id. Customers under legal age or w/out proper id, will not be permitted to purchase alcohol or tobacco products. This change in Wal-Mart policy is an effort on our part to restrict the
availability of these products to minors"
2007-06-20 03:40:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by boricua_lilly 3
·
1⤊
5⤋
Libs don't like it. They don't have any reason, but libs usually don't have any reason for any of their 'whacko' beliefs....not that I have anything against libs.
2007-06-20 04:11:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Thomas Paine 5
·
1⤊
0⤋