Don't forget that the U.S. government would love to establish a client state in that region. They failed to find weapons of mass destruction and then conveniently changed the reason to give them democracy. Lol, what a joke.
Iraq was invaded for oil, control the Iraqi government and establish a military base there.
2007-06-20 03:13:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Nearly all the 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia so why attack Iraq.
Bin Laden is also a Saudi.
Two reasons spring to mind are that the Bushes are friends with the Saudi Royal family and that Bush Jr is getting revenge for his Dads failing to finish the job last time. Bush Snr is the real power in the white house.
2007-06-20 03:14:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by seph 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
U're rite..Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Bush is the biggest terrorist of all. Unless we have a pipeline going through Iraq, we wont leave.
2007-06-20 04:23:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Luv Peace 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Governments for the time of history have used "terrorist assaults" to bend the will of the human beings. the U. S. has already did it with pearl harbor (verify US records for declassified information displaying that our government new approximately it and aloud it to take place). Who else ought to of made NORAD stand down? 19 adult males residing in caves won't be able to do this! regrettably, with a touch study, all human beings can see for themselves what the plan is. a clean international Order. that is being vigorously generic precise now, precise in front of the international. individuals are beginning off to wake - extra ought to. i might hate to have a plague like the president has been promising magically take place this Nov.
2016-10-18 03:29:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Still an Idiot, keep the 10 points.
You really need to get a life and do a little fact checking before you spew all this garbage and leave the crack pipe alone, give it a rest already.
The terrorist are not the Iraqi citizens, they are the Al-Queda that is hiding within their borders. Don't take my word for it, look it up. Oh wait, that would require real effort and take time away from your spewing garbage and smoking crack.
2007-06-20 03:12:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by grinslinger 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
We are fighting in Iraq to save the good decent Iraqi people from terrorists and insurgents. I am sorry but you argument is very weak. There are several groups of people in Iraq. You cannot simply lump everyone together.
2007-06-20 03:19:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by gerafalop 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
one more time..We are not fighting the Iraqi's We are fighting the insurgents and Al Qaeda for sticking thier dang noses into it.....
Insurgent -a person who rises in forcible opposition to lawful authority, esp. a person who engages in armed resistance to a government or to the execution of its laws; rebel
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insurgent
al-Qae·da- a radical Sunni Muslim organization dedicated to the elimination of a Western presence in Arab countries and militantly opposed to Western foreign policy: founded by Osama bin Laden in 1988
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/al%20qaeda
2007-06-20 03:11:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by snickers 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
You don't understand We are not protecting them we're trying to stop them!!!!!!!
You need to wake up and smell the coffee dude...
They will attack us again if we don't fight them try to study islam its not as "peaceful"
as they claim
2007-06-20 03:07:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cheer=♥! 2
·
1⤊
6⤋