Are you an objectivist, a subjectivist or a skeptic?

Answer 1

I try to be objective but most of my thoughts come out subjective and this leaves me skeptical about the whole thing!

Answer 2

I'm a subjectivist. Believing in the connectedness of all things in the Universe/s, I recognise that what may at first appear as an object is actually an aspect or a part of me in the wholistic sense.

Because we are all connected I believe that we can only see those aspects of self even when we attempt to objectify them. Thus whatever I think about another person/thing is really what I actually think of me.

Answer 3

Subjective.

I would call myself a universalist. This idea is quite a scholarly way to look at religion and the spiritual world. My beliefs lend me to think about "God" or as a prefer, the meta-physic principal, to be eternal and universal. In this case, on subjects of religion, I subject the ideas into the perennial philosophic principals.

Hope that made sense :O)

Answer 4

i'm a skeptic to some degree. Some types of info should be taken with a grain of salt. skepticism is good and helps prevent naivete.

Answer 5

Forever the skeptic.

Answer 6

None of the above. I consider myself to be an objectivism scented non-sequiturion. But if pressed, i'll take Kierkegaard over Wittgenstein. My favorite theater is that of the absurd. But not necessarily in that order.

Answer 7

I'm a skeptic. And yet, I'm not sure...

Answer 8

http://www.humannature.com
http://www.humanity.com

Answer 9

i am all rolled into one and more