Im going to be frank here, the evidence is overwhelming to say she was. Overwhelming. If you haven't looked at it, don't bother posting. If you have, what are your thoughts? I guess the more pressing question is, will they ever achieve justice? (Cue people to start making ad hominem attacks and straw man arguments- deal with the facts!)
2007-06-20 01:59:53 · 26 answers · asked by Paul F 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Don't see any motive that makes sense or evidence that points to it being a factual premise
2007-06-20 02:02:22 · answer #1 · answered by wizjp 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I can't see that there was any motive for them to kill her. The people who knew her well knew that she was not pregnant and knew that her fling with Dodi Fayed was just that. It is Mohammed al Fayed who is keeping this going, with the enthusiastic help of the Daily Express, whose owner is a friend of al Fayed and whose one sided reporting is quite disgraceful. The idea that the Queen, Prince Phillip or Prince Charles is behind this is ridiculous. I am sure that there are anti Royals who will want to believe anything to their detriment, but that's what it is - wishful thinking.
As Dave s rightly points out, if she had been wearing a seat belt she would probably have survived. The reason for the crash is that Dodi Fayed, hardly the sharpest knife in the drawer, panicked and ordered to driver to drive dangerously fast. Also, if Diana had not rejected her own body guards she would never have been at the mercy of the likes of Dodi.
2007-06-20 05:07:01 · answer #2 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
worked with an ex Scotland yard detective at the time of her death and he used the term done deal - meaning a hit, he said anyone could work this out it was easy a set up by either the police or the secret service
2007-06-20 09:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by hockey sticks 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will always be speculation no matter the evidence. Have you seen the evidence for yourself or are you making a decision based on other peoples views? Where is this evidence that she was murdered? Is it not better to let it lie? There will always be conspiracy theories, this one was started by a bitter little man that cant accept that his decision on that night led to this tragedy. The decision not to wear a seat belt probably cost Diana her life, whos to blame for that. Personally im getting sick of the theories and no doubt so is Dianas sons.
2007-06-20 02:15:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
MI5 were responsible for her death, although she was not really the main target, Dodi was, she just happened to be a casualty of their action. Al Fahiad is not liked here in the UK The British Government still refuse to issue him with a British passport.. There is no way the government or the royalty of this land would have allowed an Arab to become the step father of the future heirs to the throne
2007-06-20 02:10:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
alongside with love , you get possessiveness and feeling of possession. of course there's a conflict if our enjoyed loves and likes some distinctive man or woman. A deep rooted love for somebody has undesirable section results of suspicion and doubts and our risk-free practices mechanism gets thoroughly activated in case we come across a intruder. i ought to decide to differentiate between love of mom this is in born and given, and there the situation could desire to be of jealously in case she starts off loving your brother or sister than you. yet in case of your love with a greater robust half with opposite intercourse the situation is greater appropriate complicated. on a similar time as your dating is going on actual, this is surely in all likelihood that there might precise be a 0.33 man or woman indoors the dating and subject concerns get disturbed. this could happen any time , even after marriage ! So one might ought to maintain away thoughts and take a rational call as quickly as you think of your enjoyed develops gentle dating with some distinctive man or woman.
2016-11-07 00:36:08 · answer #6 · answered by bojan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Diana was murdered. How anyone can argue it was the result of drink driving beggars belief. Henri Paul's blood sample was tampered with.
And how fortuitous that the cameras at the entrance to the tunnel weren't working.
As one of Charlies pals said, "Diana is a loose canon". Make of that what you will........
2007-06-20 03:32:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
There's so many facts and rumours about the whole story I'm not quite sure what to believe! 10 years now, is it since she died? and still they haven't come up with any answers. For the sake of the Princes, I think the story should be kept out of the media until some clear answers are established!!
2007-06-20 02:14:01 · answer #8 · answered by Libby F 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I believe Diana was murdered and, I don't think the truth will come out for a long time, if ever.
2007-06-20 04:15:25 · answer #9 · answered by Ysanne 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is a good question and I believe that the truth will never come out .Do I believe there is more to the story and facts of her death yes i do and what ever happen to the lone security guy that survived?? and who paid him off to keep his mouth shut?? the only thing i keep coming up with is more questions .. so .. yes i am a believer that something happened the night she died.. who is behind it ??
2007-06-20 02:07:05 · answer #10 · answered by jgilbertdo 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Don't see why they would bother. In reality, she was a person of no consequence, so for them to get involved makes no logical sense.
2007-06-20 07:06:31 · answer #11 · answered by gortamor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋