what about severely handicapped couples or those with previous history of child abuse?
2007-06-20 00:10:45 · 33 answers · asked by sas 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
I think so, generally speaking. Since this is in the LGBT section I'm going to focus on the topic of homosexual couples being denied adoption rights.
Why?:
-Do they think it will rub off? What a stereotypical and hypocritical outlook. It shouldn't matter.
-Do they think it could hurt the child? A child can be in just as much danger with heterosexual parents.
-What about homosexuals with children from previous relationships? If gays shouldn't have children, doesn't that mean the gov't should take them away?
Any way you spin it, it's discrimination.
2007-06-20 04:18:11 · answer #1 · answered by Leeloo Dallas Multipass 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With rights come responsibilities.
In the case of severely handicapped parents... I don't see the problem, if their disabilities do not interfere with their parenting skills. Despite what many people think, Most severely handicapped people make good parents. I would demur if and only if the parents use the child as a carer, instead of employing a full time PA. I would take the child from them if they don't have a PA. The child is entitled to a childhood, after all. If they have a PA (Personal Assistant), then there is no problem.
Previous history of child abuse? In such cases, the abuser has give up his right to be a parent as he is not fulfilling his responsibilities as a parent in ensuring a safe environment for the child. Especially if HE himself is the danger.
SO ... if people expect rights to be parents, they have to be prepared for the responsibility that comes with parenting. Not willing to take on the responsibility? Don't be parents.
2007-06-20 00:19:30 · answer #2 · answered by Balaboo 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is not a question of whether they have the rights- its whether they would be able to raise children without causing them any harm. A person with a history of child abuse is most certainly not fit enough or safe enough to be a parent- the same with drug addicts or people with a history of violence. Severly handicapped people come under a different umbrella of questions all together- look at Alison Lapper with no arms and tiny legs- she is a brilliant artist and mother- but her life has been frought with all kinds of issues especially relating to the care of Paris her little boy. It much depends on the handicap and the support network they have. There are however people in none of these situations who could be deemed unfit to have children because they neglect their kids, are selfish or have more time for themselves than their offspring.
2007-06-20 00:19:45 · answer #3 · answered by Ellie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hi there,
Being a parent and raising a child is not a right but a privilege. Anyone can do the deed but not everyone should! Raising a child is a huge responsibility which many people seem to not think about during their moments of lust, passion, or whatever. If you are responsible enough and ready to devote the love, affection, caring and nurturing that is so needed then yes, go ahead and raise a child. If you are not ready for that responsibility, think about your options! As an elementary school teacher I see far too often the effects on children who know and feel that they are loved and wanted versus those who know and feel that they are not loved and not wanted.
Cheers.
2007-06-20 01:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's more a question of people being CAPABLE parents, than just exercising that right. There are 'normal' couples who shouldn't be allowed to have a dog, let alone a child, while there are "severely handicapped couples" who wind up being ideal parents.
2007-06-20 00:17:12 · answer #5 · answered by dreamchaser8860 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Serverely handicapped - If they are capable of care, love, attention. And they can pay the bills then sure. and there is no burden of care placed on the child(ren).
Child abusers- i would say no since they can't be trusted. Its not fair to put the abusers needs over the child.
2007-06-20 00:57:55 · answer #6 · answered by Magic D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that everyone has the right to be a parent but not everyone can be a parent.Now-a-days the society has kids bringing babies into the world and I personally dont think its right.The child shouldnt have to go through life with unfit parents (i.e. young children who arent ready to be parents)
There are so many disadvantes that the child could experience while be raised in such an environment.
2007-06-20 06:05:35 · answer #7 · answered by Due Oct 21 09 with baby boy! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely no - not everyone has the right to be a parent. If you can't look after a child and give it all it needs, not wants but needs, then you shouldn't be allowed to be a parent. People that have previously abused children should definately definately not be given second chances. These are young lives we're talking about here.
2007-06-20 00:14:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Severely handicaspped do have the right to have children whether they can or not is another question. However child abusers should not unless they are strictly monitored.
2007-06-20 00:14:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oprah has suffered child abuse, was raped by her 19 year-old cousin, had a miscarriage at age 15.
Are you saying if Oprah's baby survived that child protective services should have stepped in to steal her baby away from her?
2007-06-20 00:29:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋