English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

One administration briefs the other on the way out. It is the responsible thing to do. Remember Clinton downsized the CIA and the military when in office (to balance the budget he said). You may not like Bush's policies, but at least he is not a flip flopping liar.

Behold the Democratic hypocrites!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts&mode=related&search=

2007-06-19 23:22:11 · 11 answers · asked by George 3 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Answer: Say no more...'nuf said!
Now keep posting that until everyone sees it!
Be warned! That is far and away to much truth for the left to handle.

2007-06-19 23:38:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Clinton came to office ridding a lie (middle class tax cut) and left office ridding another lie ( budget surplus) an 8 year path of deception.
He did nothing about repeated terrorist attacks against America,incouraging futher attacks and we're paying the price now.

2007-06-20 06:37:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The military was being downsized BEFORE clinton even took office. It started after the cold war ended.

2007-06-20 06:26:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Whats your definition of hypocracy?

Is it saying we need to close the borders of the US and then doing NOTHING to CLOSE those borders?
Is it saying we need tighter scanning of cargo coming into our seaports, but defeating a $650 million appropriation to do just that?
Is it saying "Im gonna smoke bin Laden out of his cave", and in 5 years, nothing?
Is it FINALLY abolishing abortion? No? He didnt do that either?
Did he push the no gay marriage amendment to the US Constitution?
Did he promote the passage of the Balanced Budget Amendment? Or a no flag burning amendment?
Has he fixed Social Security? I recall THAT was a big reason to hire this man to do a job he hasnt done.
HAS HE ARRESTED OSAMA BIN LADEN?
Is it saying that Iraq is a sovereign nation and if they wanted US troops gone, he would remove them? This is part of the White House transcript for the Rose Garden press conference last month:
"THE PRESIDENT: I would hope that they would recognize that the results would be catastrophic. This is a sovereign nation, Martha. We are there at their request. And hopefully the Iraqi government would be wise enough to recognize that without coalition troops, the U.S. troops, that they would endanger their very existence. And it's why we work very closely with them, to make sure that the realities are such that they wouldn't make that request -- but if they were to make the request, we wouldn't be there."
But doesn't even when confronted with this?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092601721.html

2007-06-20 06:32:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

No, the more you say the more we realize you are one of the twenty eight percent supporting our failure of a President. Hypocrite...saying you are a compassionate conservative and letting American citizens in New Orleans suffer for days while FEMA did nothing and then saying good job Brownie, very compassionate, letting thousands of FEMA trailers sit in Arkansas while our citizens are homeless due to a natural disaster. Spending our country into massive debt, very conservative. Need I say more?

2007-06-20 07:21:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

After 7 years that is the best excuse you can come up with?

2007-06-20 06:40:59 · answer #6 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1 1

Great Avatar! and I agree they flip flop a lot.

2007-06-20 06:25:45 · answer #7 · answered by ThorGirl 4 · 2 1

How convenient that you 'forgot' that Bush disregarded everything Clinton briefed his administration about.

2007-06-20 06:27:07 · answer #8 · answered by flushles 3 · 3 3

one thing you can say for clinton. he made the character level in the office an easy benchmark to improve...

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-06-20 06:32:53 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3 2

There is so much more.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bus h, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations. "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2007-06-20 07:30:35 · answer #10 · answered by hugahugababy 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers