English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-19 20:16:38 · 15 answers · asked by just hanging around 5 in Politics & Government Elections

15 answers

I think Clinton/Edwards is more likely.

2007-06-19 20:23:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I actual lean in direction of liberal. although, i can't say i could be too ecstatic approximately Clinton being the candidate for the Democratic cost ticket. Her husband grew to become into the appropriate president in recent situations, yet Hillary i discover to be too polarizing and integrated into the political equipment. If it got here down it to along with her against the present probably GOP applicants, i might in all likelihood %. her reluctantly. I supported McCain in his 2000 bid, yet he's now no longer that candidate. One cost ticket i might strongly propose is Wesley Clark as president with Obama or Edwards as vice president.

2016-11-07 00:13:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

With Bloomberg doing what he's doing who knows what will happen? I would choose a democrat over a rotten Republican but there may be other options too.

If a Republican were to win by default due to a third party the US would fall into a civil war. After what the Republicans have done to the US over the last 6 years, they should be embarrassed to front a candidate.

I like Obama more than Clinton. People know that Hillary is just a member of the same old corrupt group running the country. There should be more choices than people from the same families. If extreme change doesn't come in the next election, Americans may take it into their own hands to force the country into change.

2007-06-19 20:24:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Nope. It will be H. Clinton as the Vice-president candidate and an unknown (to the public at least) white Governor from a Western or Southern state as the Presidential candidate. The Obama thing is just something to let the blacks THINK the Democrats are on their side. It's a trick. (A trick that has been used a lot. Show a black face and they think they are being heard.)

2007-06-19 20:24:18 · answer #4 · answered by Alea S 7 · 0 2

I wouldn't be at all surprised. Hillary brings New York and the South, Obama brings the Midwest and African Americans. Sounds in some ways like a dream ticket. Of course, they'd have to avoid being too nasty to each other in the primaries, and Obama would have to be willing to subvert his ego and take the number 2 job, but I think those are achievable. I think what might worry the party operatives is if you add up all the people who aren't sure about a woman as president and add in all the ones who aren't sure about an African-American, is that enough to lose the race? Stay tuned.

2007-06-19 20:27:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I'm hoping to vote for Obama but with Rottenham Clinton on the ticket I would vote Republican YUCK!

2007-06-20 00:46:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Obama-please God! Clinton-God forbid!

2007-06-19 23:43:28 · answer #7 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1 1

I hope so. Then the Republicans will win easily.

2007-06-20 04:12:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, and I'm damn glad of it.
U r confused, no doubt, if you think that would "fix" anything.

2007-06-19 20:25:23 · answer #9 · answered by ideamanbmg 3 · 0 1

sounds like a nightmare.

2007-06-19 20:21:20 · answer #10 · answered by Jetglam 1 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers