English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

To me murder and beheading is alot worse, and it happens to contractors too, not only soldiers. Yet the media, with the exception of the Michael Savage show won't cover the events.

2007-06-19 19:41:55 · 10 answers · asked by The Instant Classic 2 in News & Events Media & Journalism

10 answers

No contest really, obviously killing someone is worse then dressing them up. And obviously, the isolated incident of torture by a few American soldiers cannot compare to the institutionalised torture and beheading of terrorists.

Nevertheless, the Western elite are somewhat racist and don't expect any better from the terrorists so don't comment. Either that or they are delusional.

2007-06-19 21:12:58 · answer #1 · answered by Tony 2 · 1 2

Clearly there is no need for this question to be asked of course murdering contractors and soldiers is worse. Unless they were granny panties just kidding. Michael Savage is on the forefront of the majority of issues from illegal immigration to the war on terror.

Panties on the head means nothing its a fraternity hazing more than anything else in its nature

2007-06-20 03:14:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

or what else is worseis an ignorant person above saying the president lied about WMD's when her liberal friends voted the same way with the same information, or her spreading that crap on here. I'm sick oh hypocrites.

I don't get that either they make such a huge deal about that but they decapitate our guys, I don't exactly think it's an even trade or an eye for an eye. They are doing very inhumane things, I don't think the Abu Graib was quite as serious as what the Insurgants and other terrorists are doing.

2007-06-20 02:37:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Glenn Beck does. Very well.

Aren't the silly libs on here so cute in their ignorant bliss. "Oh it's a war for oil." Have they not been to a gas station lately??? Oh what a surprise!! Patois. Sounds French.

Personally, I think we should be feeding them pork and shrimp and giving them all pet dogs and playing Michael Jackson's Beat It 24/7.

2007-06-20 04:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Patois has many good points and I agree that the US govt has turned into the bad guys. This doesn't mean that the terrorists are any better. A direct answer to your question is that death is always a worse course of action. but... There are no definitive answers to Fanatics. Whether western politicians or Eastern religious yahoos. A terrorist is a terrorist . the worst thing any one can call someone. period Any one who is convinced that they are 100% correct is not anyone you should ever listen to.

2007-06-19 20:09:07 · answer #5 · answered by Traveler 7 · 0 3

I completely agree. Daniel Pearl and the others would have loved to have his picture taken with panties on their head.

2007-06-20 02:58:05 · answer #6 · answered by Aquaria 4 · 3 1

There is a lot worse ways to torture someone than by putting panties on their heads. If they think that is torture, they would hate what i would do to them.

2007-06-22 08:18:22 · answer #7 · answered by jawa12 2 · 1 1

I know and absolutely agree.
They decapitate people and blow up little kids on buses and we're supposed to understand.
We have a few idiots that put underwear on some guys head and "Americans are evil, and they are committing atrocities..." and so on.

2007-06-20 02:04:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

What's worse? Lying about WMD and invading two nation's without just cause to more conveniently plunder oil and secure oil routes after the very same terrorist organizations that now Secretary of Defence Gates / then C.I.A. Gates originally funded and trained to function as terrorists-for-hire have started to make trouble for your oil buddies and so you exploit U.S. troops and use them as tax-payer paid security forces for private oil companies while racking up the largest national debt in the history of mankind and just maybe have even been behind the so-called terrorist attacks in NYC and Washington. Oh, and let's not forget being the first Presidency in the history of the United States to officially elevate torture to "acceptable". THAT'S worse.

2007-06-19 19:55:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 8

making terrorist wear panties

2007-06-22 21:19:44 · answer #10 · answered by john 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers