Can you liberals answer a simple two choice question???

Question

Or will you just dodge it and call me and other conservatives names?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Atj_3FvskZ1pC0FrrHn3J_bsy6IX?qid=20070619111824AA5b1xh

bush dude, I don't spam. Do you know how to read?

Proud Mary it's "you're" not your.

mike1942f - I guess you don't have a good comeback. I would go for the tape since it doesn't constitute death. Jerk.

pinche_bush - you spew out garbage like that guy, why_are_you_so_upset...are you two friends or the same person?

bunz - ha ha, brilliant! Did I see one of those signs right? Black Panthers?!

crabby_blindguy - Iraq had NO ties to terrorism?! Are you crazy or drinking too much kool aid? Democrats that voted for the war even said so.

here to help - see referenced question :)

pinche_bush - my favorite genius....tape comes off. drowning is, well...drowning. What would you opt for? The same thing maybe?

avail_skillz - Is that the best you have? Good answer, good answer! Get outta here until you have 'skillz'.

balls - Thanks! An intelligent answer :)

Answer 1

Not sure what you asking, but you don't have to invade a country in large scale and change regimes to go after terrorists. Radical Islamic extremists are found in all continents. Found in Indonesian Islands, Africa, Asia, America, Europe... Who knows may be in North Pole.

Far as I'm concern your neighbor might look at al Qaida websites get inspired and go bomb something the next day.

The problem is this growing anti-US sentiment combined with Radical Islamism. Not democracy. Not 'evil regimes.'

The next attack will probably come from our own citizens converted by al Qaida literature and media. That's how it went down in Madrid, London. People with no ties to organized group like al Quida going out to bomb stuff.

War on terror IS different. Not conventional war. I don't know why we're fighting big conventional war in Iraq when we could have just dropped bombs on training camps, cave...etc. I mean we got bombs that can clear out bunkers. No need for regime change.

The question is do you something to convince people that the US is good decent country? Or do you just play whack a mole, killing 'bad guys' as they pop up? Over and over.

We're 100 years behind al Qaida on this PR game. al Qaida is playing this PR game way way better than we are.

We won't win this thing if people keep believing what al Qaida tells them instead of what we're telling them.

It is unconventional war. You can play whack a mole for million years or actually do something to stop the spread of Radical Islamism.

Answer 2

i assume what I could say is, and particular, I examine the entire positioned up...is that when Mr. Obama Condemned Republicans for elevating the Debt Ceiling by utilizing some Hundred Billion $$ in 2006, why is powerful management on his section to have Congress advance is $a million.2 Trillion in 2010? We have been in a million much less conflict....there became no Stimulus or TARP money to pay out....gross sales became on the subject of comparable to it became in 2006, so what it the reason to Spend $a million Trillion extra in 2012 than in 2006? And why is he Justified in doing it yet Mr. Bush is Vilified as an Evil Villain? this is all I ask, and have yet to get carry of an effortless, existence like rationalization from all and sundry. thank you for all the attempt you place into your question, and on your activity in what is going on.

Answer 3

I was going to answer - then I saw the part about;

"Iraq had NO ties to terrorism?! Are you crazy or drinking too much kool aid? Democrats that voted for the war even said so."

I know who's drinking the moon-aid, and no rational argument is going to satisfy someone who believes there were ties.

Answer 4

That one's easy--actively confronting terrorism.

Which is what a loyal American would have done--concentrated on fighting the terrorists were they are--in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

But I said "loyal Americans--" conservative or liberal. Bush and his supporters showed their lack of patrriotism when they choose to invade a country with no ties to terrorists instead.

Answer 5

Will you stop drinking the blood of puppies tomorrow, or later?

See?

Some questions require the honest, intelligent person to reject both options.

If you were interested in what liberals think, you'd ask them, not give them YOUR idea of the only two choices.

Committing crimes against humanity doesn't reduce terrorism, it increases it.

That's why we have the problem in the first place.

Answer 6

probably the reason why you have to ask a question that links to your others, is the fact that most people are trying to avoid your lack of grown up thought.

Answer 7

Liberals are incapable of answering ONE question let alone TWO-parts to one.

Answer 8

Here's a brilliant liberal trying to answer a simple question!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVROC-gsnXA&mode=related&search=

Damn! Talk about being smug there truthseekr!

Answer 9

I can answer many questions without calling names - its just not fun that way ;)

Answer 10

I lost a couple brain cells reading this