where their dollars were being invested?
2007-06-19 16:16:29 · 18 answers · asked by vegaswoman 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dinodino, I know what a blind trust is, I don't believe it was a blind trust if you get my drift. The Clintons are pathological liars.
2007-06-19 16:29:28 · update #1
Not a chance in the world !!
And for those who wish to believe otherwise , consider it this way . . . . . .If you were the broker of a former President and a current Senator's account , wouldn't you be updating them , more than anyone else you ever served ? Me thinks YES !!!
Me KNOWS Yes !!!
2007-06-19 16:22:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
Anyone who has money in a blind trust doesn't know where the money is invested. So as far as the money that was invested in that blind trust, no they didn't know where it was invested. Hillary was required to disclose all her investments as a requirement for being a Presidential candidate, and has since liquidated all her stock that was in the blind trust.
If you don't understand what a blind trust is, I can see why you might believe they knew where that money was invested, but you would be wrong.
PS Ok don't believe it. Proves nothing, is just your opinion. Trusts are highly regulated and plenty of politicians use them. File a complaint with the SEC and see how far you get. Personally I don't think she's that stupid to violate termsof a blind trust when she's aspiring to be President , this could easily come to light, and she's too politically involved to have time to be involved in managing investments anyway.
Ken you are blowing smoke: Blind Trust: A financial arrangement in which a person, such as a high-ranking elected official, avoids possible conflict of interest by relegating his or her financial affairs to a fiduciary who has sole discretion as to their management. The person choosing the trust also gives up the right to information regarding the status of the assets.
Bill Frist got caught fooling around with a blind trust, with all the scrutiny of Hillary I am sure any violation of the terms of the trust would have come to light by now.
2007-06-19 16:25:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Wow! You aren't too bright are you? The Clintons support the womens right to choose, not killing children. How dumb are you? This issue has been addressed left and right you morons still say that. Bush advocates innocent civilian deaths along with our troops death in a war that is going no where. Bush also allowed hundreds of people to die in the street of New Orleans while he was on vacation Your ignorance is so deep that you see Bush, a self-proclaimed killer, to be less supportive of killing people then Clinton. It's a good thing people like you don't matter in society, because as soon as anyone hears moronic statements like that you immediately forfeit any possibility for any position of responsibility. Now get back to mixing that concrete.
2016-04-01 06:33:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So no matter what the facts are that explain these investments it isn't going to be accepted by you unless it's something shady, is that right? It's a blind trust, but of course you choose not to believe that because to believe it would take away another opportunity to talk smack about the Clintons. Perfect. So everything they say is a lie, and you know that this one is a lie too because it MUST be, after all it's the Clintons. Got it. All they do is bad and evil, and everything they ever have said or might say in the future is a lie. It must be a burden to be so uniquely informed about their personal finances that you can just declare without hesitation that this wasn't a blind trust, they're just liars.
2007-06-19 16:41:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not any more than the Bush families finances, from Neil's bankrupting the Colorado, Silverado Saving and Loan, then just getting a slap on the wrist for his part, then the tax payers bail out to the tune of millions of dollars, to W being able to with very little money buy into a baseball team, then use his contacts to have public financing, and then selling his share for millions too. Then we have the Jeb Bush deal that was never really explained with the Nigerien government.
2007-06-19 16:27:23 · answer #5 · answered by jean 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well when Bill left office, Him and Hillary were worth around 5 to 7 million dollars. In 6 short years they are worth over 100 million dollars. I believe they are all too aware of where every penny is coming and going!
2007-06-19 16:23:51 · answer #6 · answered by MRJERK715 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Bill and Hillary have known to be "careless" with the handling of money.
I don't believe most of the things the Clinton's say.
2007-06-19 16:21:57 · answer #7 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Obama got them on that but, the Clintons busted Obama with Tony Resko...
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/184540,122306obama.article
2007-06-19 16:31:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
all these people are professonal liars with a big nose. no one on earth would ever tell the truth.
yes or no . yes , these people are professional liars. never never never listen to a politicians.
2016-02-20 06:57:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shes a lawyer hes a disbarred lawyer blind deaf or dumb turst they knew besids she was on the board of wlamart , she had to know that and much of the blind turst stock was in walmart and ugh defnese contracting firms..humm
2007-06-19 16:44:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋