English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a) owning beakers and flasks and certain chemicals without a licence*

b) marrying someone who's the same sex as you

c) running with scissors

*actually, this is already illegal in some places, see link:
http://memepunks.blogspot.com/2006/06/americas-war-on-science.html?dupe=with_honor

2007-06-19 12:57:13 · 17 answers · asked by ? 7 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

17 answers

Absolutely ridiculous! None of these things should be outlawed. That link is just another example of the government overstepping their bounds.

2007-06-19 13:02:13 · answer #1 · answered by AJ242 3 · 1 2

The answer is B, but actually it is already against the Law. Many are trying to change the law and allow same sex marriage, but at the moment, at least in most places, it is still against the law.

But no matter what 'Man" does to the law, the Law that matters is God's Law!! God has written in His Book of instructions to us, in many, many places, that the sexually immoral will be put to death. And that is not just physical death.

Check out God's Law for yourself!! Start in Leviticus Chapter 18. There's plenty more, both in the Old Testament and the New Testament. Within the last few paragraphs of The Book of Revelation, our Lord makes it very clear that the sexually immoral will not inherit the kingdom of heaven.

It's time!! Right now!!

Love to ALL!!
Lin

2007-06-19 20:17:41 · answer #2 · answered by Lin 1 · 1 2

Tweakers Suck so A. I like the part about licensing. If you have to have beakers, you can have beakers. You just need to have a reason. A reason other than cooking meth. Did I mention that tweakers suck. If you disagree with me, go spend 5 hours with a meth affected baby. Definately A.

2007-06-19 22:36:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I guess A. B is already illegal in most jurisdictions and would need to be made legal first. C is difficult to enforce and probably could be classified in many jursidictions as reckless endangerment.

2007-06-19 20:05:20 · answer #4 · answered by Seinen Wakichou 5 · 0 0

I prefer none, but if you have to choose one

a) im not going to look at the link, but my guess is that it was in some cracktown, becaus there was so many people producing meth or something else.

2007-06-19 20:05:25 · answer #5 · answered by EDUCATE about MARIJUANA 4 · 1 0

Sounds like our government has way too much time on its hands. I guess they have to talk about something when they never address any real issues.

2007-06-19 20:12:32 · answer #6 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1 0

I think A should be outlawed everywhere... B is absoultly fine the way it is, and C thats just your own decison.

2007-06-19 20:06:15 · answer #7 · answered by livelaughlove1379 3 · 0 0

I think A is already illegal
B has always been illegal
C I wouldn't be surprised if it is illegal somewhere.
But if all were 100% legal right now then I say B should be made illegal

2007-06-19 20:04:57 · answer #8 · answered by The Cajun Mason 2 · 0 3

A, A and A

the other two, who cares as long as no one else gets hurt. B would be a decision that only "God" should have judgement on (at that is my opinion only) and C is just plain stupid but certainly should not be a crime

2007-06-19 20:03:02 · answer #9 · answered by Cindy Roo 5 · 0 3

C of course

2007-06-20 14:20:25 · answer #10 · answered by Mac 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers