2007-06-19 12:20:24 · 18 answers · asked by tracyterry 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
I'd say "Grow up"!
We have been there, are going back and some day will establish moon bases and eventually land on Mars!
Not in "your" life time, will we land on Mars, but, maybe our Great Grand Kids will see it!! (Ahh, to live for those days of adventure!)...
You still have people believing that Kennedy is alive, Elvis is alive, and all kinds of nutty theoriest who are willing to 'put forth' the notions that this didnt happen or that didnt happen just for thier 15 minutes of fame... But, it all comes down to its either true or false, and when we establish a moon base eventually, it will be there for all to see with a good enough telescope. They probably dont believe that we have a space station either, so, let them stick thier heads in the sand and get left behind...
I wish you well...
Jesse
2007-06-19 12:44:00 · answer #1 · answered by x 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The moon landings were real. But some of the photos are fake. For example can the flag be flying opened when there is no wind on moon ? I do not mean the solar wind which is a different thing. Then, can you take your own photo unless at that time they have a robot for doing that ? If the moon landings were not real, why should we bypass the moon and go to Mars instead, go to Titan instead; should not we be investigating the nearest object first and it should be the moon ?
2007-06-19 12:31:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
properly genuine if there have been lighting fixtures on the moon, i'm specific that would desire to deter maximum hoax theorists. I doubt the government could deliver unmanned probes to create "synthetic easy" on the moon purely to assuage the hoax believers who have not got any credibility because it quite is. however the problem right this is will there be adequate bases to create easy. I doubt it. motives why we are in a position to work out lighting fixtures on earth from area is by using the fact we've satellites in orbit that would capture the element of the Earth at nighttime. The moon reflects the solar, for this reason us being waiting to work out it, so i think of that would desire to overpower any lighting fixtures. i assume in the time of crescent moons and eclipses you would be able to desire to work out it, yet i'm specific that would desire to piss off an incredible sort of folk; you recognize, a organic eclipse that hardly happens is ruined via humanity's mark. it quite is like putting a wind mill interior the decrease back backyard of those whining belongings proprietors on Cape Cod hahaha. the actuality of the problem is, there does no longer be a huge adequate base for lighting fixtures. they could have an indoor lab for examine and perhaps even missile silos or some style of protection gadget against asteroids. those are the only 2 issues i will think of of for makes use of on the moon.
2016-09-28 03:13:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please take your non-scientific, opinion-begging questions to the Entertainment section. This is not a question in pursuit of knowledge. It pursues GOSSIP.
That's what I would say.
And dear Matrushka, when did you see the flag undulating? When the astronauts were touching or planting the flag? The only time I saw it "waving in the breeze" was at blast-off time for the LEM. Now I think it was pretty self-evident where the "wind" was coming from -- hot gasses from the rocket blast.
Yes, Golden Ticket, I was there! I even proved, with a group of students that the astronauts' signals were coming from the direction of the Moon's surface for two missions. What have you got, but a hoaxer's attempt to make money off of naive youngsters who couldn't tell truth if it came up and bit them on the keister.
2007-06-19 12:31:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How does the "moon landing hoax theorist" know that THEIR theory is not a hoax ? Ask for facts and evidence to back up their claims.
2007-06-19 12:28:55 · answer #5 · answered by Max 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'd want evidence, and I'd want some indication that they actually understand enough to interpret their evidence correctly. In seven years I have yet to come across anyone who can provide the second of those criteria.
2007-06-19 12:26:05 · answer #6 · answered by Jason T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Forget about them. They are too enamored with their conspracy theory, so any evidence you present to them they will dismiss as unconvincing. There is no point in arguing with people like that.
2007-06-19 12:32:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they were real.Don't worry about the people who think they were a hoax.After all there are still feeble minded souls who think the Earth is flat.
2007-06-19 12:50:50 · answer #8 · answered by Charlotte's Dad 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I still don't get the part where the flag is ondulating as if there was air on the moon.
2007-06-19 12:28:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How do you know? Were you there?
Educate yourself on the overwhelming proof of a hoax on YouTube or Google video. Here are just two very brief introductions.......
2007-06-19 12:25:50 · answer #10 · answered by >Golden Ticket< 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋