If an invading army attacked your country, 1.would you just accept as is,or2. attack by whatever means possible, whether it means that you could be counted as a terrorist ,by another country ?
2007-06-19 10:37:07 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yes. US use double standards policy.
They are invading and occupying other independent countries while they pretend to fighting with terrorism.
When people defense themselves and their country against invader (Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.) they will accuse to terrorists.
We can see these double standards policy against free fighters in Lebanon and Palestine too.
US is supporting Israel for killing innocent civilians completely.
All the people have right for defense themselves against occupiers.
2007-06-19 11:43:55 · answer #1 · answered by ±50% 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
If an invading army attacked my country? I'd definitely fight back!
Oh wait...I get it! You're saying that these insurgents in Iraq are simply responding in a natural way for someone whose land is overrun with an invading force--in this case the invading force is the US.
My God, that never occurred to me! How did I not see that? Why did that thought never occur to me!??? I'm going out now and talking to all the people at the bus stop about it!
2007-06-19 17:45:09 · answer #2 · answered by Here..have some Kool-Aid 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I had an argument with my husband last night he insisted there were no innocent people and all the ones who got killed were insurgents. Considering that many of the victims are young children and babies I doubt this. Personally I do not blame them for fighting back. If we were really over there to free them Saddam is dead anything beyond that is just oppression. I'd like to see a comparison of how may innocent Iraqi and Afganistani people are killed by terrorists and how many are killed by US forces.
Links to some of the things we are doing over there. The last link has pictures of a disturbing nature. I am in no way saying all the soldiers behave like this but I don't believe we should be over there. We are hurting those people more than helping and I don't blame them for wanting us to leave.
2007-06-20 09:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by Angela H 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It depends.
Gandhi was able to get the British to leave India though peaceful, non-violent demonstrations.
If that would work that would be the best option.
In the case where the occupying power fully intends to say for a short period of time (such as the US in Iraq) it is better to offer no resistance so that they leave sooner.
If they intend to permanently hold the territory at all costs and expel or subjugate the population then you fight with all you have.
2007-06-19 18:28:29 · answer #4 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well obviously the natural response to being invaded is to start killing your fellow countrymen (or preferably women and children). After all, nothing says "get out of my country you filthy foreigner" more than attacking my own brothers.
And just for those who don't understand internet sarcasm: Fight against the invaders, if you want, but using an invasion as an excuse to murder those in your country of a different religion (or religious sect) doesn't make you a hero.
2007-06-19 18:07:15 · answer #5 · answered by Tony 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Since I'm a 69 yo handicapped citizen, it's hard to picture myself as a terrorist-but if an invading army came down our street-I'd shoot as many of them as I could before they got me. If that makes me a terrorist-then I guess that's what I'd be.
2007-06-19 17:54:46 · answer #6 · answered by phlada64 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Are they coming to free me from Bush's rule?
I would definitely not be a rebel fighter.
And yes I see your clever ruse about the whole Iraq issue.
2007-06-19 17:45:57 · answer #7 · answered by Trimere 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
who cares, what those invaders think of me, I 'd hit them with all I have, like my father did in ww2 in france.
2007-06-19 22:43:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would defend myself and my home regardless of what the media and their goons tried to label me.
2007-06-19 18:17:06 · answer #9 · answered by arianah 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are right in that the Gazans continue to attack sovereign Israel, while Israel refuses to fight back.
The greatest threat to the West today is radical Islam. It must be defeated while that is still possible.
.
2007-06-21 09:49:07 · answer #10 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋