Which do you prefer? high taxes or free health care and college education?

Question

I mean lower taxes

Answer 1

I would pay the higher taxes that would give free education, health care, and child care.

My education (BA + MA) costs $80,000 and I pay $400 a month in loans, my insurance takes out $100 from my paycheck bi-weekly, and it's around $400 a month from decent child care. I'd rather have it taken in taxes. It would work out to be less.

Answer 2

Lower taxes of course.

There's no such thing as free health care or education. You'll just be paying for it through your taxes instead of directly to the school.

When you go to the store you are concerned with 2 things; price and quality. "Hmm, I'm not sure this is worth $10; I don't think I'll buy it." This is called a first party purchase. You are buying something that you are going to use so you care about price and quality.

Second party purchases are when you buy something for someone else. You aren't going to use it so you aren't all that concerned with the quality but the price is still important. "Only $5? Yeah, she'll like it." That's why we've all given and recieved gifts that we would never buy for ourselves. The purchaser was concerned with price but not quality.

Finally we get to third party purchases.This is where you buy something for someone else with someone else's money. Here you are no longer concerned with price or quality. "$20 for that?! Sure whatever, it's not like I'm paying for it."

Now then, what you have to realise is that all government purchases are third party purchases. The politicians aren't paying for it and they aren't going to use it. Therefore, by definition, they will waste money on anything the government pays for. This is not to say that they should not be paying for some things. You just need to realise that anytime the government spends our tax dollars they will not be getting our money's worth, nor do they really care. After all it's not their money.

So, do you want someone else to spend $300 of your money for your $200 insurance policy or would you rather choose your own policy and get what you pay for? Or perhaps you rather not have health insurance and get a nicer house instead. After all you're the one that worked 40-60 hours a week to earn the money. Perhaps you think it's fair that you be the one that gets to spend it.

Answer 3

That is a false choice... the way the healthcare system is run in the US fosters high spending. Single Payer health care would foment preventive medicine and lower costs.
Right now your taxes are being given to corporations in the form of no bid contracts, tax write off's and subsidies. If that money were being used in schools and hospitals your taxes might not need to significantly increase
We could even make your taxes decrease!!!! Educating the population will make them realize what an incredible waste the US defense department is. It is spends much more than it needs to for conventional warfare. Its nuclear spending is over kill and it is illegal. Nuclear disarmament would be cheaper. It cannot stop terrorism, in fact it creates terrorism by pouring arms and training any time it needs a proxy army. If the defense budget were slashed to a tenth it would still be more than any other country.... and your taxes would be way lower.
Besides, the way taxes are set up is regressive. The poor pay more than the rich. That is inefficient and unjust because most of the benefits given by the government are enjoyed by the rich, such as military contracts, tax loop holes, police protection and paved roads. You can't get any of that if you are poor.

The choice is current High taxes to maintain the rich and make enemies abroad or Lower taxes to maintain a government sponsored education healthcare and a more armonious world.

Answer 4

Lower taxes.

I consider the time I spent in college a waste of my resources and my time. Had I not gone to college, I would be economically and professionally better off, as I would have a 4 year jump on where I am now in the marketplace.

Regarding Health Care, free health care is fine, but if it is the result of higher taxes, it is not truly free. The question remains what would I pay in taxes because of a health care system, and what would I receive from the system. If the relationship is equatible, then it is a benefit for me.

However, government run health care is based on the ideal on inequity. In order to function, it must take more money from those who would otherwise in a free market spend less, in order to pay for those who in a free market who would pay more. Someone has to pay for your health care, and that person is not getting a fair market value for their dollar.

The lower my taxes, the more employees I can hire. The more employees I can hire, the better my business does, as it enables me to leverage my time. The better my business does, the more I and my employees make. The more we make, the more we spend. Wealth is created, and everyone benefits.

Interesting to note, higher tax rates does not always equal higher tax revenues. For example, when George Bush Jr. cut the Capital Gains tax rate, the actual revenue achieved from the Capital Gains Tax increased. Economics is a parabala, and the key is to find at what tax rate revenues are maxamized. Too high of taxes equals low revenues, as does too low of taxes. Equilibrium is necessary to maxamize our burgeoning economy.

I apologize for any spelling erros. Spell check failed, and I did not have the time to proof myself.

Answer 5

in this section the colleges, grade colleges have been final and consolidating for quite a few years now. began under Carter and maintains via at the instant. The Junior severe, has closed one in all the two homes it used, tore that closed bldg down and equipped administration places of work. the middle college (9-10) remains open, yet lots smaller pupil physique. The HS college I attended (at that factor grew to become into 10-12, because of the fact the middle college had no longer been equipped) grew to become into crowded, I had 1110 different Seniors graduate with me. at the instant there are approximately 690 Seniors, so one much less grade and 2 million/2 the class length. My college is likely one in all the greater moderen colleges so if there grew to become into closures it would be yet another college to accomplish that first. yet, as for tax base, because of the fact I graduated, Pullman closed (approx 3500 jobs long gone), Magnetics decrease some time past (600 jobs), American Hardware closed, 450 jobs, fortress Rubber, closed 450 jobs, worldwide Staple, decrease lower back, 200 jobs. The writing is on the wall, there'll be even fewer scholars, as nicely as a decrease tax base to maintain those colleges open. Now, if AK metallic the place to close, this city could be a ghost city in greater strategies than no longer.

Answer 6

Typically, if you want to fund something like free health care, you'll need very high taxes, so it's not really a matter of prefering one or the other.

I prefer low taxes, I'll use the proceeds to pay for my own health care. I already paid for my own college.

Answer 7

A simple problem with your terminology. If you're referring to a government program, there is no such thing as FREE!! In order for the government to give you something, it has to first take it from you. Period. Therefore, the government will never give you free health care and college education. They will simply compel you to pay whether you like it or not. I'd rather have the lower taxes so I can choose for myself if I'd like healthcare and whether or not I want a college education. As it stands, I now have a college education and my job offers medical as a benefit to retain employees, NO GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT NEEDED!!!

Answer 8

I am opposed to high taxes. I am opposed to government funding of colleges. I am opposed to universal health care, run by the government, and paid for with tax dollars.

There is no free health care. It has to be paid for somehow.

Answer 9

I'd rather pay high taxes than pay for free healthcare and education for everybody in this country.....

Answer 10

you can't get one without the other honey.

Although I do wonder if a free education would have the same supposed affects as trickle down economics. Think about it Reagan fans, its a business investment in the people.