English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why Should the president be blame for somthing that he was not involved in?

2007-06-19 05:25:04 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

4 answers

Well you don't expect the press to blame Hamas for the Hamas takeover do you? Like most liberal 'thinkers' it's always someone elses fault.

2007-06-19 05:43:22 · answer #1 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 2 1

Jack Cafferty is a grumpy old man that likes to stir and spin the truth to suit his fancy. I have never favor Bush's foreign policies but the middle east Hamas problems have been here for 1000's of years. and will continue as long as religion is the main force in determining their policies. Jack just like to ask controversial questions to cover up his stupidity.

2007-06-19 06:14:45 · answer #2 · answered by wreaser2000 5 · 1 0

If anything, He keeps supporting Abbas & Fatah in the hopes of maintaining status quo which he believes is better than having "Iran" next door to Israel. By supporting Fatah with money and weapons he is keeping the in-fighting alive since Iran is supporting Hamas with the same and Hamas is stealing from Fatah.

2007-06-19 05:38:59 · answer #3 · answered by tobi 4 · 0 0

Why not? They lay the blame for just about every other ill on the planet in his lap, what's one more?

2007-06-19 05:46:37 · answer #4 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers