Who all agrees with me when i say that our president is leading us in the wrong direction? He says we have to win the war, which i guess is more important than human lives? i dont think so.
2007-06-19 04:29:29 · 14 answers · asked by christinaa. 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Okay, i do understand that the troops did go over there for us, and i respect them greatly. I do give him credit for taking all the stuff people have said about him. Just please understand this is my opinion, you respect mine, and ill respect yours.
2007-06-19 14:06:26 · update #1
I think Barbara Bush tried to drown him when he was a baby. so he has brain damage.
2007-06-19 04:33:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
You know, all through out American History there's been two sides of opinion in all the wars we've been in. The right side, and the democrats. Democrats wanted to cut and run in the American Revolution, The Civil War, Viet Nam, N. Korea, WWI WWII and the current Iraq War. They were pissed off at George Sr. for not going after Saddam in Desert Storm, funny. Anyway, you guys have been singing the same song and dance about war for 200 years, and you've been wrong at every turn. The only dem. with balls to do what it takes durning war was Truman who droped not 1 but 2 bombs on Japan to but an end to the war. With that way of thinking, I think Truman was a closet republican.
2007-06-19 04:56:19 · answer #2 · answered by crknapp79 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have been in the wrong direction ever since he alleged Hussein had WMDs, which he didn't. We could have been "through" in Afghanistan already if Iran had not diluted our efforts there.
Iraq does not need to be THE battleground against terrorism. It is already a battleground between the Sunnis and the Shiites and the Terrorists are delighted that we are caught up in it since it offers a smoke screen for their cowardly but deadly attacks against our "police" there.
Whether we disengage in a few months or a few years, Iran is going to collapse into Civil War. Do we really think our presence will end their centuries-long conflict? Let's fall back and choose multiple, small battlefields using our stealth, intelligence, Air Force, Navy and Special Forces to hit 'em wherever they can be found. Annihilating all the separate pockets of Terrorists is how we're going to win since they are not stupid enough to stand toe to toe with our conventional forces.
Human lives are important, and sacred. They should be spent very wisely and in small amounts until the Terrorists have forfeited theirs.
2007-06-19 05:24:52 · answer #3 · answered by OkieDanCer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Winning the war is important to saving human life. I don't agree with every thing Bush does but I do agree that it is important to stabilize Iraq and to take the war to the terrorist instead of waiting for another 9/11. That is my 2 cents worth. Bush's strategy is not necessarily the best but his intentions are right. He seems to understand that the terrorist are serious and that they will go to any lengths to damage our country.
2007-06-19 04:37:14 · answer #4 · answered by joevette 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He has been side tracked on a few things however winning the war is the most important thing facing us today, if not then or grandchildren will be forced to wear diapers on their heads and bow to mecca 5 times a day. Winning the war is saving human lives as well as humanity.
2007-06-19 04:33:57 · answer #5 · answered by 007 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
He is leading us in the right direction, or have you already forgotten the 3000+ killed on 9/11? We cannot take $h!T from third world terrorists and a quick reminder, everyone fighting over there has volunteered!
2007-06-19 04:35:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I am sure all the people with an IQ under 70 and no guts will agree with you. Darn, think of all th elives we could have saved if we had surrendered to Japan after Pearl Harbor.
2007-06-19 04:53:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
All I can say is thank God you are not the deciding vote on anything. If we went your way, we'd all have our butt in the air praying 5 times a day to a fake god.
2007-06-19 05:30:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is better, no that´s not a good way of putting it, what is less worse...
+3500 dead troops today or +35,000 dead troops 10 years from now?
2007-06-19 04:47:06 · answer #9 · answered by James R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think about 72% of the country agrees with you.
2007-06-19 04:45:15 · answer #10 · answered by pastor of muppets 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, he accomplished making his daddy, James Baker and his friends in Saudi Arabia including the bin Laden family alot more money with this war. They all belong to the Carlysle Group and along with Haliburton they are making billions off our tax dollars by selling war machines to the pentagon for this war in Iraq. I think he is a diabolical criminal along with Cheney and Rove. And, the American people who voted for this traitor are the ones that were stupid.
2007-06-19 04:34:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋