English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

FILL IN THE BLANKS

2007-06-19 04:26:10 · 7 answers · asked by DON'T ARGUE W/ FOOLS 3 in Arts & Humanities History

7 answers

Oliver Cromwell! lol

2007-06-19 06:12:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oliver Cromwell

2007-06-19 04:30:02 · answer #2 · answered by msuetonius 2 · 0 0

Oliver Cromwell (1649-1660)

2007-06-19 04:39:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oliver Cromwell was not just "De Facto" dictator, he was officially Lord Protector of the Commonwealth.

2007-06-19 04:34:43 · answer #4 · answered by Doc Hudson 7 · 1 0

Oliver Cromwell, for context seach on "cromwell interregnum"

2007-06-19 04:44:38 · answer #5 · answered by lorem_ipsum 3 · 0 0

i don't think of they're a de jure state. they are in an somewhat weird and wonderful subject, as they are below foreign places profession. Israel has been attempting for particularly it gradual to declare they don't occupy Gaza, yet it in easy terms recognizes the management interior the PA and not the management in Gaza. of direction the West economic corporation the place the PA has some administration is easily occupied, and below the Oslo agreements the two aspects are one entity. below the Hague rules, the Occupying skill could take care of the interests of the civilian inhabitants interior the occupied territory - determine nutrients, water medical care and grant humane therapy for prisoners, admire due technique rights etc. nicely of direction Israel has been frequently violating that. additionally, recognizing the coercive skill of occupying forces, I belive international regulation additionally says that those residing below profession can not negotiate away territory (i'm not a criminal expert, so do not take my be conscious for it). If Gaza extremely weren't occupied they extremely could could have the desirable to a sovereign military, and if that they had that military they probable does not be legally occupied. yet keep in mind that Israel needs the profession of Gaza to be considered ended. probable because of the fact a) it could then not be responsible for the wellbeing (nutrients, water, medical care, even employment etc) for the Palestinians in Gaza (not that that is rather ever fulfilled that accountability ) b) The Occupying skill could in easy terms kill people who're immediately in contact in harming the occupying forces, and in easy terms whilst they are engaged in harming them (additionally frequently violated by utilizing Israel), and could make each and every attempt to apply arrest and non-deadly skill for its protection. If Gaza had a protection rigidity, Israel could then attack it. nicely, legally, they could have no justification for crossing exterior their borders, extremely, till they have been at conflict. So this is my precis. Israel needs the profession of Gaza, a territory it at the instant controls below belligerent profession, to legally be over, partly so as that it could legitimately be at conflict with it as a "adversarial entity" and attack and injury it. pass discern.

2016-10-18 00:50:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

oliver cromwell

2007-06-19 04:55:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers