2007-06-19 01:59:30 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No one is a sure thing untill they've had at least ONE VOTE cast for them in a primary.
Ask Howard Dean
2007-06-19 02:01:40 · answer #1 · answered by wizjp 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I am a democrat and have been since I was able to vote the first time for carter in 1976. I think dems might win but I won't waste my vote on hil. She can't win, I don't care how much money she has. I don't have alot of respect for her since she didn't have the guts to get away from her philandering hub. Leopards, zebras, etc don't change their spots and Bill will always have the wandering eye and something else that I cannot say on here.
2007-06-19 09:08:47 · answer #2 · answered by victoria c 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nobody is unstoppable at this point. That applies to both parties. It is far too early to begin picking the winners in the parties. Far too many things can happen between now and the primaries.
As far as Eds opinion goes it is exactly that. Ed's opinion. It would certainly seem that a majority of citizens do not share his opinion concerning former President Clinton.
2007-06-19 09:05:06 · answer #3 · answered by toff 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No not neccessarily, a lot can happen between now and the primaries, and during the primaries, but honestly I don't see how she loses at this point. She's running against Obama and Edwards and I don't see how either of them win. If they get lucky they could win the primary but I don't see how either 3 will win the election. They pushed a lot of good people out early so it could be Hillary vs Obama. I think all of them are unelectable, but then again with Bush I don't see how any Republican could win either, so it will be interesting. If the Democrats run a really good campaign they could win but they really screwed themselves over with the candidates.
2007-06-19 09:06:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. It means that she's raised lots of money. BFD. Doesn't mean anybody is going to vote for her. Doesn't necessarily mean that anybody is going to vote for Obama or any of the Republicans either.
Personally, I'd be happy if that little crazy guy from Texas with the ears popped up again at the last second (Perot?). I'd vote for him.
2007-06-19 09:25:41 · answer #5 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Barack's campaign was getting on her case for raising money in India. If she keeps taking that kind of heat from her own side, I think just about anybody will be able to stop her.
2007-06-19 09:03:05 · answer #6 · answered by greeiore 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Georgie,
If Hillary was "unstoppable" she certainly would not be inviting a loser like Big Bad Bill to go with her to Iowa. He is the one who will draw her some support there. She has no chance of winning at the polls in my opinion. I think that if a woman is going to win then they must be able to win on their own. Have a wonderful week.
Thanks,
Eds
.
2007-06-19 09:04:17 · answer #7 · answered by Eds 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hellery is far from unstoppable
most of the country hates her & most of the rest fear her
she will not be the democratic nominee
2007-06-19 11:57:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on how many votes she can buy with that money. Mine's not for sale and I would not vote for her if she was the only one running.
2007-06-19 09:03:43 · answer #9 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No it means a lot of money out of the gate is on her.
2007-06-19 09:02:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋