Out of your own experience
just curious
:-)
2007-06-18 17:13:12 · 24 answers · asked by enki 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
It all depends on the person education, ethics, and background, along with the culture where you live in and the social level to which that culture have evolved...
I believe lust to be a instinct kind of thing... then we are born to someday feel the need for sex... because of our instict to reproduce...
But our ever evolving ethics and social interactation and undersatanding makes us every day move farer from our animal instinct to a wiser way of seeing things and human interaction...
What I am trying to say... as we evolve in our ways of thinking and understanding the need for happiness rather than surviving, lust is fading away and things like love are talking its place...
We might have sex for lust sometimes... but when we are trying to be happy rather than feed our needs we have sex because of love, with someone that makes us happy rather than just satisfy our animal needs...
Hope that helps!
CHRIS
2007-06-18 17:40:01 · answer #1 · answered by CRA 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Wow what a question hahehehe I would say its a combination of both at first it is the attraction Lust or whatever you call it but that calms down I think and you feel Love............. I think that sex is sacred and meaningful when you love that person and feel for their essence and well being. So many people can take sex lightly and be with many people and some not they value their bodies menatally, physically and spiritually. I think that people jump into relationships based on the physical and than they are not with the right person who knows you have to use your judgement it is your life....If the sex is out of Lust by one partner in a relationship and there is no true love there the relationship will never work!
2007-06-19 10:12:50 · answer #2 · answered by Rita 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sex is out of lust. You can lust for someone you're in love with or someone you're not in love with. You can also lust for someone that you love but are not in love with. But if you feel no lust for someone then no matter whether you're in love with them or how much you love them... no sex.
This explains why most humans are neurotic on some level or another ;)
2007-06-19 01:45:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lust mostly in my exp.
Sex out of mostly love, do guys know how to do that?
:)
just curious!
2007-06-19 01:38:09 · answer #4 · answered by shellyshell311 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One does not have sex without lust, but it's possible to love without sex. (Possible!) So I'd have to say--mostly out of lust.
2007-06-19 00:38:28 · answer #5 · answered by Valac Gypsy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Own experience, it's about love. Though there is certainly lust involved I will not sleep with someone I am not in love with.
2007-06-19 00:19:28 · answer #6 · answered by MoonWater 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lust prior to my husband. Definite love with my husband....which is the best there can be because its a conglomeration of intensity of both lust and love.
2007-06-19 10:34:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lust...unless it's really love <3
2007-06-19 00:21:29 · answer #8 · answered by polly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, lust, definitely. But there's no reason you can't lust after the person you love, too.
2007-06-19 02:07:08 · answer #9 · answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lust (not out of my own actions). It's the definition, actually.
2007-06-19 00:24:36 · answer #10 · answered by shmux 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋