2007-06-18 17:04:43 · 17 answers · asked by uyt8907rgdlgiout 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is no truth for the american public. There are more questions than answers regarding what happened on that day.
Everyone needs to do their own research and find as much information on the topic before believing the official story. Who really gained from the destruction of the towers, Bin Laden or the US military and oil companies?
2007-06-18 18:55:28 · answer #1 · answered by meg 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I would strongly suggest you look at how much fuel a jetliner actually holds and consider if this will cause a "small fire". All of these planes were in the first part of a trans-continental flight, meaning that they would be nearly at maximum fuel capacity. Here are the maximum fuel capacities of some common aircraft that are used in such flights.
Boeing 757-200: 11,489 gallons
Boeing 757-300: 11,466 gallons
Boeing 767 (all commercial models): 23,980 gallons
Even a 50% full tank of fuel would cause a fairly large fire.
2007-06-19 00:39:17 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
What you don't understand is why you don't realize how ridiculous you sound. An aircraft crashed into a high floor wiht jet fuel that was ignited. That meleted the stell supports just enough to give way to the immense weight of the upperfloors, and some of that debris fell on the third building, setting it on fire and covering it in debris. And there you go, thats all all three fell.
2007-06-19 00:14:41 · answer #3 · answered by rosslambert 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
What truth are you looking for? The truth is that some crazy terrorists slammed planes into 3 buildings and lost a fight causing a 4th to go down in a field.
2007-06-19 02:23:14 · answer #4 · answered by bigdaddy33 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Small fires? The one in building 7 burned for over 7 hours.
2007-06-19 00:11:49 · answer #5 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 8⤊ 2⤋
I would read the popular mechanics story on the Myths of 9-11. And those "small fires" were the result of 2 very large airliners with a full load of jet fuel. not small by any measure.
2007-06-19 00:09:58 · answer #6 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 8⤊ 4⤋
Thousands and thousands of pounds of Blue Max jet fuel do not coincide, at all, with 'small fires'.
2007-06-19 00:10:36 · answer #7 · answered by acesfourpal 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Look, Dufus. Shortly after 9/11, a fuel tanker truck exploded in Connecticut, and just this year another one exploded in California. Both melted bridges, which were made of steel.
Is it really that hard to grasp that steel is MADE by being melted in a fire?
2007-06-19 00:09:48 · answer #8 · answered by open4one 7 · 13⤊ 4⤋
They weren't "small fires" and didn't only destroy three structures.
2007-06-21 09:18:20 · answer #9 · answered by ddey65 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth is know by people that don't keep their heads up their poop-chutes.
2007-06-19 00:21:24 · answer #10 · answered by ideamanbmg 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋