Republican's are often slandered and called names espically in reference to wanting a police state, yet both

Question

Waco and Ruby Ridge took place under Clinton. LbJ's ally Richard Daily had the Chicago Police club media reporters and peace demonstrators during the DNC. FDR had inturnment camps for an entire nationality of people just because they were Japanese Americans. So who's the real party of non tolerance?

Answer 1

Testify Reverend Paul!! Say the truth, let their lies turn to ashes in their mouths as the defend the indefensible!

Answer 2

I'll take these one at a time:

* Ruby Ridge took place under George H.W. Bush.
* The Waco incident began a month after Clinton took office, carried out by George H.W. Bush's FBI and ATF. The FBI was led by Bush appointee William Sessions.
* In 1968, at the time of the DNC riots in Chicago, the party was split between hawks and doves. There was no "peace and love" in much of the party back then.
* I oppose the Japanese internment and would hate to see anything similar happen again, but who could seriously argue a Republican president wouldn't have taken the same action as FDR during World War II?

Answer 3

Bill Clinton was personally responsible for Waco and Ruby Ridge?

And last I checked, Ann Coulter was defending FDR's decision to intern the Japanese.

Answer 4

To term Ann Coulter a frontrunner in the Republican social gathering is like asserting Mickey Mouse is a frontrunner in the Democratic social gathering. if certainty learn with the aid of fact that's what Coulter does. think of of her as style of a suitable wing Micheal Moore and you get the final theory. I bear in mind Pres Clinton asserting some unkind and ungentlemanly issues at the same time as he grew to become into in workplace, so what? Ann Coulter purely cares approximately advertising her insipid books and advertising her way of existence. do no longer examine greater effective than that into something she does or says.

Answer 5

Parties change but individual ideology does not. Dems were once conservative and Reps were once liberal. Tolerance is a liberal versus conservative matter, not a party matter. There are moderate Reps that are very tolerant and there are conservative Dems who are totally narrow minded.........Basically, you have two types; Authoritarians (conservative/neoconservatives) that don't tolerate much of anything outside of a very narrow viewpoint and Libetarians (not the party) who are more tolerant (not completely tolerant) and much more broadminded (abstract thinkers)........Its about two different ways of seeing things (perspectives) neither are totally wrong or right and both are purly American.

Answer 6

The Democrat party has long since proven itself to be the party of intolerance,it is a consistent fact that the loudest voices for "tolerance" are almost always the most intolerant.

AD

Answer 7

Hello my friend...... you forgot Ilian Gonzales was during the Clinton reign as well, as well as the firings of 98 Federal Judges (to LIL' B's 8), to the Travelgate, White water to the Bimbogate to Blackhawk down to the Embassy bombing to the Uss Cole...... but who's counting? LOLOLOL

Answer 8

You would see the ending of a commune that abuses children, sells weapons, and the leader Cons everyone ito thinking he is Jesus to swindle followers out of possessions, as lack of tolerance.
swindling people out of money, for God, is the right-winger way!

<>
if you think Lincoln did this because of moral obligation, you need to study your history books better.

Answer 9

The Republicans also were the party of Lincoln who freed the slaves. And Ronald Reagan helped bring an end to communism and the Berlin wall.

Answer 10

The Republicans!

Answer 11

Easy. They both are. The two party system is broken.