And why?
At this point I'm not entirely sure what each candidate stands for. I'd like to hear some thoughts and (good) reasons why they deserve to be voted in.
2007-06-18 16:25:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Rudy for sure. He's not too right and not too left. He also is a proven leader and won't back down to terrorists. I've been a fan of him for a while.
2007-06-18 16:27:25 · answer #1 · answered by Moss B 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't agree with Ron Paul on every issue, but his respect for the Constritution is the thing this country needs most right now. The North American Union is being planned and pushed forwar without any democratic dialouge with the people. The only candidates not willing to sacrifice our Constitution on an altar to corporate power are Paul, Kucinich and Gravel. Obviously Ron Paul is the only one with any chance at all.
A Neocon is NOT a Republican! And anyone whose votes furthers the Neocon Agenda (spelled out in their PNAC - google it) is not putting the AMerican people FIRST. Hilary and Obama and Rudi and McCain and all the rest are corporate PUPPETS without respect for the Constitution.
2007-06-18 16:45:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ralph Nader---if he runs, I'll vote for him yet AGAIN.
Who is more qualified to run this country than a man who dedicated his entire life to preserving the safety of the American consumer?
Can you imagine, if all the people who really didn't care for either Bush or Kerry had exercised their right to independent thought and action, and voted Nader? Does anyone think we'd be in the mess we are in?
Don't be fooled by the Big Parties. We need a viable third party, and we won't have one unless U.S. citizens STOP being slaves to the Democrats and Republicans. They're just about one in the same.
2007-06-18 16:30:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well since it is still almost a year and a half until the presidential election I think I will hold off on deciding, there are other candidates that will announce they are running, you havent even seen all of them.
2007-06-18 16:28:03 · answer #4 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm voting for Sen. Clinton and working on her campaign. I like her plan for Iraq, her plan for getting back to really fighting terrorism, her appreciation for exhausting diplomacy before military force - though she would not hesitate to use it when warranted and most of her stands on domestic issues. She's wickedly brilliant, qualified and she's one tough cookie. I have no problem imagining her dealing with tyrants and standing toe to toe with dictators - she's got steel for a backbone.
2007-06-18 17:25:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul.
He actually believes in the constitution (and the 'natural rights' ideals on which it is based).
None of the other candidates seems to believe in these values.
2007-06-18 16:27:27 · answer #6 · answered by energeticthinker 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
different GOP applicants think of "Who else will they vote for?" Will Ron Paul supporters shift to vote for Obama? i think of not. Who will you help if Ron Paul isn't the candidate?
2016-11-25 23:02:40 · answer #7 · answered by samrov 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None at this time. We need someone who can help most of Americans to love their country again.I don't see that in the people running.
2007-06-18 16:28:46 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Fred thompson, he has th experience, he is no nonsense, I lkie what he says on the issues
2007-06-18 16:30:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Tancredo has always been against illegal immigration, and recognizes its threat to our future sovereignty. He's also not a socialist commie-nazi.
2007-06-18 16:28:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋