and beat the next horrible candidate Democrats put up against him?
2007-06-18 14:59:49 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You need a lobotomy. It will improve your intelligence. BTW, he can't steal Florida a third time, our new Republican governor got rid of the machines Jeb used to give him Florida against the will of the people.
2007-06-18 15:05:38 · answer #1 · answered by toetagme 6 · 11⤊ 5⤋
Interesting idea. With the man's approval ratings, why would Republicans offer him up for sacrifice? I think Democrats would love this idea.
The problem seems to be the Repubs are struggling to define what they really want in a candidate. [So are the Dems.] The runners are all over the spectrum. The strong Repubs cry out for a true strong conservative. But after yrs of exactly that [until recently with the immigration bill, Bush fit that description], are they really confident a strong conservative will keep the Whitehouse? Look at the approval rating for Bush.
I believe this election will be settled much like so many. 10%-15% of voters vote for a candidate. The remaining votes go to "the lesser of evils." There was a move a few yrs ago to put None of the Above on the ballots. The politicians wouldn't allow that for fear None of the Above would garner the majority.
2007-06-18 15:14:23 · answer #2 · answered by XPig 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is better than anything with the last name of Clinton. I think that term limits should be imposed, get rid of some of them that has been there way to long, like Kennedy, Reid, Clinton, McCain, Edwards, Kerry etc.. Some have been there so long, they have mold growing out of their ears, alcohol blindness and can not see the forest for the tree's, and are NOT for the American people, oh! and they need to take self serving Nancy P with them.
2007-06-18 15:15:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It's obvious you are a big fan of George Bush. If you really are, this should be the last thing you wish for. It would be too painful for you to see him beaten as badly as he would be. And as a fan, it isn't nice of you to wish such a bad experience on one of your heroes. Your hero has almost single-handedly guaranteed a Democratic victory in '08, no matter who the nominee is. Maybe he SHOULD take the humiliation that's going to come along with that, why not, he's the one that made it a reality.
2007-06-18 15:28:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
As a proud conservative I hate to say it,but no.I think it's a good idea two terms.They tried to repeal the Roosevelt amendment during the Clinton years also.Think of the mess we would have now if they did.
2007-06-18 15:15:13 · answer #5 · answered by ak6702 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't matter much, we already have an oligarchy of sorts. Its already been about 20 or so years of Bush/Clinton rule by the two families. It'll be even longer with Hillary. Who wants to see this:
Bush ->Clinton ->Bush-> Clinton? ->Bush?...
2007-06-18 15:26:50 · answer #6 · answered by hcl404 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sounds great
Bush in 08
the left cries when he wins legally
so why not give them a real reason to cry
2007-06-18 15:41:14 · answer #7 · answered by KittyCatFishApe 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The poster Boy for the necessity of Roe V. Wade has spoken!!
I applaud GWB--thanks to his efforts you will not see a (R) Presidency or majority in the House or Senate for generations to come!! BRAVO!
Romney McCain Guiliani = Moe Larry Curly
2007-06-18 15:08:07 · answer #8 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Put the glue bag down and back away slowly.
2007-06-18 15:45:43 · answer #9 · answered by gone 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I have a hunch that you watch Nascar and scratch your balls a lot.
OK, let's get rid of term limits
Bill Clinton vs George W Bush
I think we all know that outcome. hahahahahahahahaha
2007-06-18 15:12:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Even if the term limit did not exist, Bush would never get reelected. Haven't you heard his approval rating is in the 20's?
2007-06-18 15:03:56 · answer #11 · answered by greencoke 5 · 8⤊ 4⤋