2007-06-18 14:12:35 · 18 answers · asked by Unknown 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
You know that is a good question and we've already had a big problem with inexperience with our current president. I also worry about Obama being under experienced which is why I would vote for Joe Biden. Unfortunately it doesn't look like he will be elected due to this teenage girl crush everyone seems to have on Hillary and Barrack (honestly it's like they are famous actors or something) not that they are bad people I just think Biden is a better choice. Considering that he is currently the chairmen of the U.S. Senate committee on Foreign relations. I believe with him in power our foreign relations would be in much more experienced hands.
2007-06-18 15:23:19 · answer #1 · answered by peter r 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that a Clinton/Obama team is somewhat likely. I find the prospect to be pretty interesting.
I'm tired of rich dudes working for super rich dudes.
I'm for Ron Paul as my #1 choice though. The agents specializing in interent disinformation are all churned up about him.
2007-06-19 00:52:04 · answer #2 · answered by Watched 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you compare it with the experience of the present Commander in Chief, I sincerely believe that Barrack would be a significant improvement.
If you compare him with any of the other Democratic Candidates, I would ask one question: How many of you knew that the Iraq was was a mistake before it started? So how much experience did that take?
2007-06-18 22:10:01 · answer #3 · answered by MUDD 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he claims to have been against it but at the time he wasnt in a voting position. just about all of the democrats claim to be against the war now but they still voted to fund it. the truth is that if he was in the senate at the time he probably would have voted for it as well. they all had the double set of intelligence but were afraid to go against the president in the post 9/11 patriotism.
and no i fear him becoming leader with his lack of experience.
2007-06-19 02:39:34 · answer #4 · answered by ambientdiscord 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he has the right mind, the right heart and right ideas, they just need seasoning and more experience behind them. I do not think he is ready to lead our country. I think that he would make an excellent VP to Hillary Clinton though.
2007-06-18 22:40:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way. Nice guy. Honest. Honorable. But just does not have what it takes. He lacks the depth that would come from long term governance.
Actually, I like Hillary, and have liked her from the very start of all the campaigning, and even well before she jumped in officially.
2007-06-18 21:26:43 · answer #6 · answered by carl j 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He's replacing George Bush.
Any honest, decent person can do better, and a few smarter than average animals
George didn't even start working until after 9/11
2007-06-18 21:26:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Normally, I'd prefer more experience. But given some of the alternatives, he might be tolerable, despite that drawback.
2007-06-18 21:20:27 · answer #8 · answered by skip742 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If Arny can run Kyaleefurnia Obama can run the US.
2007-06-18 21:31:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No he doesn't and neither do any of the Democrats now running.
2007-06-19 00:07:57 · answer #10 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋