Is it liberal white arrogance that says only western nations can take care of non-white nations?

Question

all of the immigrants coming into western societies are non-white and mostly poor peoples...western nations instead of the encouragement white people to increase in numbers, in which whites are the minority in the world, they say its not necessary because we should help our fellow human...because they are incapable of doing things for themselves unless the white man helps them...thus the liberal white arrogance...affirmative action is another example of liberal white arrogance...minorites can't survive in america unless they get help and special treatment over white people...

Answer 1

no, it is stupidity from undeveloped countries to think that opportunities only exist in the western world.


I have never seen african people in China, despite the fact it is probably the best place on earth to become wealthy

Answer 2

You need a lesson in history. Affirmative action was to right a wrong done by this country against blacks and other minorities. Slavery, it was not for them to get special treatment over white people where did you get that from. Why is it so important about whites and non white. that's what is wrong with America today it should be color blind. It has given some whites the feeling of superiority they shouldn't have just because of and accident of birth. Non-white as you put it want a hand up not a hand out. It has nothing to do with being liberal. Republicans started parts of affirmative action., visit the library soon

Answer 3

No, because I hear conservatives use the same ignorant ideas. The only difference is that when conservatives use this kind of idea, it means we are going to bomb some poor little 3rd world country back into the stone age. Then when it goes bad, conservatives blame anyone but themselves.

Liberals use their ignorance to act as big brother and correct minority 'mistakes'. Conservatives don't usually even give people in other countries that much credit. To many of them, foreigners are a bunch of ignorant non-Americans, and why should we do anything for them anyways?

I hardly think that attitude is better than liberal paternalism.

Arrogance and ignorance cut across the political spectrum.

Answer 4

It's also called the "white man's burden" and it originated from imperialistic policy centuries ago... It's part of the reason we went to war in the middle east (democratization) and it is part of the reason we've made the immigration policies we have today.

People answering this question need to realize that "liberal" does not necessarily pertain to the party lines that we have drawn in America... The other WIDELY used definition of the word as it pertains to government forms is more appropriate here...

EDIT: I just read all of the other answers... I think the point was all together missed.

Answer 5

I like your answer. Another example of Liberal hypocrisy. They want us to interfere in poor country's economy's but when it comes to freeing them from a cruel dictatorship they say we cant do that.

I think Liberal white arrogance is pretty self explanatory. If that guy doesnt know what Liberal White or arrogance is he better go back to school.

Answer 6

with the aid of fact of white guilt being utilized with the aid of Marxists with the intention to devalue the belief of particularly worth in Western civilisation with the aid of destroying the nationwide identity of seperate countries, via compelled cultural dilutions that render the belief of nationwide identity redundant. it is organic collectivism. a definite volume of cultural variety is a amazing subject, and complements the rustic it is living in. too plenty, and the unique poulations of those countries have decreased rights and not exist as an integrated human beings. Political Correctness is a Communist dogma, and is largely its final ditch attempt, regrettably helpful, to wrest democracy from the West. The extra people who exist in a society at odds with one yet another interior the path of the gruesome spectre of opposite discrimination, the extra illusory decide for is fostered for an authoritarian state with the intention to diminish unfastened speech and institute extra censorious bureaucracies and rules. Communism, and it may be rejected. Over-immigration has been a socio-financial catastrophe, and non-white countries would not stand for it, so neither could we.

Answer 7

You are partly correct in you analysis.I mean Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson/Louis Farrakhan aren't white liberals.I agree with you guilt-ridden candy-@ss white liberals pander to minorities.They feel sorry for minorities.Yet no one pays any attention to poor white people in Eastern Europe or the Balkans or in rural America.

Answer 8

You have raised an interesting point. I think it's mostly arrogance, but while our nation is far from perfect, what makes other nations need so much help? I know that other government's jeopardize their own people's welfare, but I sometimes wonder how it gets as far as it does before it negatively effects their people.

Answer 9

I don't think it is arrogance. I don't think that is the right way of thinking. Affirmative Action was certainly not arrogance. It was something that was created to try and make things equal, however it was nearly enough. Understanding and compassion is what is needed. That takes time.

Answer 10

No. Just as a counter-example, there is a flood of poor immigrants from Eastern Europe to the West. They are white.