What is your definition of victory where Iraq is concerned?

Answer 1

the only way to win certain wars is to not fight them.

iraq was a terrible terrible mistake - one that we will now have to live with whether we leave or not.

the post iraq impact on america will be far greater than the post vietnam one was.

lets make those who supported this pay - shall we?

Answer 2

Victory is not in Iraq we deployed there to fight the war on terrorism and when the radical students from the hate madrases that were funded by the Saudis and the Iranians are deceased and no more of these schools are supported by such governments then we will have our victory.May god bless all the free nations of the world and those brave enough to face this plague upon humanity.

Answer 3

When every last American is gone from Iraqi soil. Where Iraq has full control of its own destiny. When its natural resources are not being raped by foreign governments. When the country of Iraq is not being played like a pawn in a game of chess. When Iraq is proud to be Iraq again and not forced into being a puppet state and its ideologies are entirely its own...this will be their true freedom.

Answer 4

Victory could only be all countries joining in and taking complete control of Iraq. Rebuid lthe country and have the oil pay for all the money we sunk into that excuse for a country.

Answer 5

When we can leave the Iraqi people better off than when Saddam was in power i.e. the individual must have taken ownership of their own future. Until the people see a possible future they believe in they will not invest in it. If the 1st world press were truly interested in world peace they would start challenging the Iraqi people to create wealth in their own country.

It is too bad the press has a vested interest in violence. They in fact are the best/main salesmen for violence!

Answer 6

Victory is already accomplished there. If you are talking about the war on terror and the insurgents that is taking place on Iraqi soil, then the definition would be, when the Iraqi government is able to fend for itself militarily to be ablt to protect itself and its people from outside influences,like Syria and Iran. OR, when that newly elected government by its peole says we are not needed any longer!

Answer 7

Getting our soldiers out of that Country with as few additional casualties- as possible. Otherwise we're nothing more than "target practice" for every Iraqi with a cause, a grudge & a gun.

Answer 8

When fascist government of Sadam Hussien is deposed (check) and replaced by one favorably disposed to the US (yeah, right, that'll happen). Alternately, when the country, if unable to govern itself, is pacified.

Answer 9

properly i don't understand in case you have been finding the news purely at present in spite of the incontrovertible fact that we already "invaded" Pakistan. We undermined their sovereignty as quickly as we crossed the border into Pakistan to discover terrorists. So now they are shooting at our helicopters. "triumphing" the conflict in Afghanistan would desire to be getting to know and killing Osama Bin encumbered and an incredible sort of of the terrorists related to him. he isn't the "chief" of Al Qaida, so terrorism would desire to bypass on in his absence, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that he's a necessary participant. "triumphing" the conflict in Iraq contains getting them returned to independence as quickly as greater. we've screwed up sufficient of their united states of america already we could extraordinarily much as good attempt to repair what we can be waiting to. Unko Dano: 30,000 persons die each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days from the impressive use of pharmaceuticals too. who's the greater advantageous terrorist, the NRA or the pharmaceutical companies?

Answer 10

We have already had victory. Sadaam was removed and a democratically elected government is in place.