I asked "More cowbells anyone?" as a reference to the SNL skit about Blue Oyster Cult's Don't Fear the Reaper. I don't get what rule I violated....
2007-06-18 12:07:04 · 20 answers · asked by meep meep 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Opps, *Why, not whay, better correct that or I'll get another violation....
2007-06-18 12:11:52 · update #1
It seems like the violation trolls are back in town....
Hehe, watch me get this question deleted
2007-06-18 12:14:33 · update #2
If it isnt a properly phrased question... or if you followed that 3-word question with a bunch of commentary... they'll yank it...... it aint right.. but they will...
2007-06-18 12:10:54 · answer #1 · answered by Barack_O' Llama 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Some guy posted a rant saying he was going to go after people that are top contributors since his account had been deleted. He wants to see everyone with the orange badge to have their accounts deleted as well. He said he had over 100,000 points. That "question" he posted was deleted, and he is now doing what he said he'd do; report top contributors.
You should to reply to that Violation email, tell them you are a target since you are a top contributor, and the source of the problem is the person that reported you. If I can find that rant or anything similar I'll let ya know.
You and I both know there's nothing wrong with "More cowbells anyone?" and the person that reported it is the source of the problem.
2007-06-18 12:16:54 · answer #2 · answered by wwhrd 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
some guy published a rant announcing he replaced into going to pass after human beings that are precise individuals in view that his account were deleted. He desires to work out quite everyone with the orange badge to have their debts deleted as properly. He stated he had over a hundred,000 factors. That "question" he published replaced into deleted, and he's now doing what he stated he'd do; checklist precise individuals. you're able to to respond to that Violation e mail, tell them you're a objective in view which you're an actual contributor, and the source of the difficulty is the guy that reported you. If i will discover that rant or something comparable i will permit ya comprehend. You and that i the two comprehend there is not something incorrect with "extra cowbells all of us?" and the guy that reported that's the source of the difficulty.
2016-11-25 22:22:44 · answer #3 · answered by thorpe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably some snot nosed yahoo nerd thought cowbells was a bad word... i thnk they are only 15 and they don't have a clue who BOC is. Maybe they freaked on the word cult....They're dorks
2007-06-18 12:16:22 · answer #4 · answered by Luvatlanta 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just for the record, that is one of my all time favorite SNL skits. Hysterical!
2007-06-18 12:28:20 · answer #5 · answered by collynn 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the Yahoo people that decide those things are only about 10 years old.
2007-06-18 12:11:08 · answer #6 · answered by Fat Boy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
f knows these days, maybe it was the word cowbells red with an a
2007-06-18 12:11:29 · answer #7 · answered by me again 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Someone felt it wasn't a question, or fell under "chatting".
Anyone who DOESN'T understand the reference has been living in a cave for far too long.
2007-06-18 12:10:34 · answer #8 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nothing wrong with your question. some loser probably reported you. Awesome skit by the way! LOL
2007-06-18 12:10:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
some idiot thoght it was fun 2 delete ur question or spam it
or someone really hates SNL
2007-06-18 12:09:20 · answer #10 · answered by Aysha. 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋