Clinton did catch the guys responsible for the 1st WTC attack.
He did a lot more to fight terrorism than Bush has done.
Bush lies every time he opens his mouth.
Clinton was a great president, and Bush will go down as the worst ever.
2007-06-18 11:56:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by questionguy 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Well, you seem to know it all, what happened to Ben Laden when Bush had them cornered at Tora Bora, DO You.
Bush lied about WMD at Iraq
Bush lied sending troops to a war that broke the 2nd Constuitution
Bush lied about how we would be gased , white puff of cloud would engulf us. Put foil on our windows
Bush lied and sent are troops to be slaughtered at a country that has never bothered us. Killed thousands of innocent Iraq people
Bush lied about all the violations that was committed on the Innocent prisoners, tortue, killings in Iraq Prisons
You can go on and on about George Bushs lies.
Bill Clinton had no evidence that Ben Laden had done all theses things. Our ForeFathers stated you are suppose to have evidence that someone committed a crime , Bill Clinton had none on Ben laden.
IT is always a Republican way to put the blame on someone else, Never taking the blame for anything.
George Bush Is a total moron with a 91 IQ , can't even read or write, he has no common sense. Gerorge Bush is so below Bill Clinton that the two names shouldn't be spoken together. You take George Bush and all his lies everyday, 52 emails just disappered from the White House a few minutes ago, but their to stupid to know you can get it off of the Hard Drive forever, You can't delete anything..
In my opinoin Bill Clinton was a great President and George Bush is a complete no good liar., a sorry Bast*** and so damn ignorant it makes you sick at your stomach.
2007-06-18 19:20:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nicki 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think Bush was President when 9/11 happened, had been President for months. USS Cole was attacked October 2000, Clinton had only few months left if office. Bush did not go after Cole Bombers or pay any attention to Terrorist threat until after 9/11.
2007-06-18 18:55:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Clinton had the privilege of presiding over a bubble economy that didn't burst until after he left office. That'll be enough, by itself, to put a positive halo on his presidency. That he accomplished little in office, disgraced that office, and set the stage for 9/11 might also be mentioned, depending on who's writing the history books.
2007-06-18 19:12:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
I don't think it is fair to blame Clinton for any failures in the white house, hell he wasn't there and Hilary is the one who ran things poor old bill was just trying to get his cigar soaked, and didn't have time to mess with such small things as running the country, so if you don't like Hilary's way of running this country then don't vote for her this time,
2007-06-18 19:27:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Spoken like a true fan of Fox News...or rather the republican propaganda network.
Aside from not knowing a damn thing about the facts behind your complaints but being retarded enough to post such a stupid question just shows how willing you are to make sure the whole world knows it.
2007-06-18 18:58:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by phule_poet 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
He will go down as a good president anyway. Listen to Rush a little more bubba.
2007-06-18 18:53:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by grumpyoldman 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
you are right clinton was not a good president...he was a great president!!!
2007-06-18 19:00:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rainman 3
·
3⤊
3⤋