Being as such laws do not descriminate between those who payed for the p0rn and those who did not reducing child exploitation is not a valid excuse. The only way they can tell such thoughts exist is by way of the p0rn so banning the p0rn is the most effective and the only feasable way of banning the thought. Such laws enable persecution for thought crime violations and condition people for further criminalization of thought. isn't it wrong that thought is crime in america today?
2007-06-18 10:29:43 · 10 answers · asked by zorvok 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
i said viewing www.dictionary.com look up the word "viewing"
2007-06-18 11:30:29 · update #1
child porn doesn't have add support, they operate underground. plus each click they get if anything would cost them money, they have to pay per click on google...
2007-06-18 11:32:37 · update #2
i guess if using google and the internet is contributing to child porn than everyone here is a bit guilty eh
2007-06-18 11:33:11 · update #3
and those who trully care about the children should not want them to have to grow up only to be persecuted as an adult.
2007-06-18 11:44:38 · update #4
I love when people like you post things on the internet. Hopefully the "Thought police" are viewing your IP address and tapping into your entire crooked view of this matter.
Do you think that just because you google "child porn" and a few pics pop of (For free) that you are not contributing to the problem?
1. You paid for your computer
2. You paid for your internet provider
3. You paid for your phone line
Therefore you have PAID to VIEW THE CHILD PORN that you are searching for on the internet, even if you manage to find it without offering up your credit card number to some scum.
Every click makes some predator rich, encourages the deviant to continue their abuse and exploits one more child.
Integrity is who you are and what you do WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING. It is what you think in spite of what your mouth actually says. In the matter of child pornography, abuse and exploitation of any kind, your thoughts should be held accountable.
2007-06-18 10:44:31 · answer #1 · answered by SelfnoSelf 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Reducing child exploitation is a valid excuse. It's an incredibly valid one. No child deserves to be forced into a situation where they are mentally and sexually abused. Making child pornography illegal helps to protect children.
2007-06-18 10:38:24 · answer #2 · answered by mugenhunt 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
wasn't action taken when the pictures were taken? or when horrible sexual acts were done to the children? how is that only thought? some of those who 'think' when they are viewing will also act on their feelings and emotions and harm a child?
not a very good question.
2007-06-18 10:35:47 · answer #3 · answered by JP 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, there are no laws that ban thinking about underage people in a sexual way, only when you act on that thought. Viewing pictures is an action.
2007-06-18 10:40:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Q: what's the desirable weight for a criminal expert? A: Ten pounds - yet that consists of the urn. lol the single above is extremely super! George and Lenny settle directly to bypass North u . s . a . in a warm air balloon. in spite of the shown fact that, neither have been somewhat experienced balloonists, and Lenny's concepts promptly drifted from navigation to concepts of ways clouds appear as if cuddly little bunny rabbits. Upon understanding that they have got been misplaced, George declared, "Lenny -- we are going to could lose some altitude so we are able to decide the place we are." George we could some warm air out of the balloon, which slowly descended below the clouds, yet he nonetheless could not tell the place they have been. far below, they could see a guy on the floor. George decreased the balloon, to ask the guy their area. whilst they have been low adequate, George called all the way down to the guy, "good day, are you able to let us know the place we are?" the guy on the floor yelled back, "you're in a balloon, approximately one hundred ft up interior the air." George called all the way down to the guy, "you could be a criminal expert." "Gee, George," Lenny spoke back, "how are you able to tell?" George spoke back, "because of the fact the advice he gave us is one hundred% precise, and is thoroughly ineffective". the guy called back as much as the balloon, "you could be a shopper." George yelled back, "Why do you assert that?" "nicely," the guy spoke back, "you don't be attentive to the place you're, or the place you're going. to procure into your predicament with the aid of a loss of making plans, and could have prevented it by utilizing soliciting for help till now you acted. you assume me to grant an instantaneous treatment. in certainty you're interior the best comparable place you have been in till now we met, yet now this is finally my fault." Does this have something to do with he e book Of Mice and men?!? (like the characters!)
2016-10-17 22:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by xerxes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can think about viewing child porn all day long. Just don't take the action of viewing it.
2007-06-18 11:54:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its still a crime. It was a crime when the photo was taken. Maybe sooner. Crime to have it and crime to send/receive it. These are children. They deserve to be children, not a sexual object.
2007-06-18 10:45:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
it takes more than thought to create the porn. a child has to be abused.
get a new hobby, sicko.
2007-06-18 10:36:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well thats one of those things that we can live with. When it comes to kids I think some extra precautions are appropriate.
2007-06-18 10:45:06 · answer #9 · answered by sociald 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it has nothing to do with thoughts.
a child is abused. end of story.
2007-06-18 10:38:02 · answer #10 · answered by brian 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋