Interesting observation.
I'll bet both the pacifier and remote would be just as quickly left behind if offered a bare breast.
2007-06-19 03:18:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
For some men I'd say absolutely yes!!! I just hate it that most men not only have to hold on to the remote, but have to change channels all the time. Just watch the show, OK!
2007-06-18 08:23:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Relatively,yes.
2007-06-18 08:25:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Barlow 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if a woman with a curling iron in her hand is equivalent to a baby with a pacifier. Don't stereotype.
2007-06-18 08:25:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by casey_leftwich 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes...but I get the remote, since I cook the meals
2007-06-18 08:24:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
as a man with a tv remote and 2 babies, I'd say no, not at all the same.
2007-06-18 08:25:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Depends on the man. But Lunatic has got a good point.
2007-06-19 05:30:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by chetter 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes...but I have control of the remote in my house
2007-06-18 08:22:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, we share the remote, and my son doesn't need his pacifier
2007-06-18 08:26:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by kittypurrrrrrr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure. If i had to have some tough-exceeded monster rubbing me up and down, i could call my dad. sure. I used to have a pair of actually, rather, rather short ones that had black, lacy, biker shorts type shorts sewn into them.
2016-10-17 22:29:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋