I mean YOU, personally.
I would laugh in his face.
And I'm a Conservative.
2007-06-18 07:44:49 · 27 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would ask him what he means by "tough on terrorism"...and then I would point out how his plans are insufficient to deal with the problem.
I highly doubt any politician knows how to properly get "tough" on terrorism...because they don't truly understand what terrorism really is.
2007-06-18 07:49:43 · answer #1 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
I would tell him , oh yeah, you are good at everything. Moving your mistress which is now his wife , into Gracie mansion while he was Mayor while his wife and two children was in the next rooms. I have no respect for him at all, he didn't even attend his only sons graduation from High School this year. He was accused of having mafia connections , been married 3 times . His first wife was his first cousin. His wife that was his mistress was married 3 times , her only daughter was so embarrassed about him and her Mother that she called her Dad to become get her and he still has her.
Just look up on your web. Rudy Giuliani scandal this all happened at the same time as 9/11. All he did was walk down the street with a mask over his face during 9/11.
2007-06-18 08:00:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I am sure that Rudy never said that. I dont think I could vote for him, but he has seen "first hand" the devastation and havoc that these animals can reek. With that in mind I am inclined to believe he would be as dillegent as any candidate out there in trying to keep the Terrorist nuetralized
Kobaincito
Listen to yourself.. And you wonder why people with your idioogy get called America Haters.
America prevokes terrorism... ? The terrorism in the world is Americas fault? Killing Children? Your talking nonsense.
So you can justify and support people strapping bombs on thier backs and blowing themselves up in a crowded cafe? Why? Because of American foriegn policy?
Maybe you should strap a bomb to yourself and stroll through Bejing and teach them a real lesson regarding that trade imbalance. Sounds like in your mind .. you would have justification to do so.
Idiotic!
Sorry off topic, but that baffonary required a retort
2007-06-18 08:03:29 · answer #3 · answered by clawdaddy314 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i'd tell the little rat face that he's done nothing but exploit 9/11 for his own benefit and this whole charade about being tough on terror and good in a crisis is completely transparent to anyone with a bit of sense and knowledge of the situation.
2007-06-18 07:55:59 · answer #4 · answered by valleybrook515 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
not as plenty time as he'd such as you to have faith. As Mayor, he could have been there plenty that replaced into his job, yet maximum of his time replaced into being a excursion instruction manual for countless officers. he's taking pot photos at Hillary approximately her time spent there, yet her job covers all of ny, his replaced into in simple terms the city of ny. it particularly is a drained previous ploy of his and he could feel embarrassment approximately equating his time there with the responders in any way!
2016-11-25 21:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by gerrit 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To each his own. I think he has more of a personal stake in terrorism than other candidates do. Laughing in his face would be a little on the ignorant side. I would ask him why he believes this and what his policies would be.
2007-06-18 07:52:26 · answer #6 · answered by only p 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
He can't do any worse than that shmoe we've currently got in office. In fact, the only viable candidate out there is Thompson but I'm not too crazy about his stance on social issues. I wish a Libertarian candidate had a good shot at winning. Libertarians are too honest for America. Americans like their presidents served with half truths, ambiguity and self serving interests.
2007-06-18 07:51:16 · answer #7 · answered by Lilith 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Look Rudy, just because you were in the Wrong place at the Wrong time,
that doesn't qualify You for anything.
After the WTC's first attack, Many people said it was going to happen again, I didn't see any great measures taken by Rudy to stop it.
2007-06-18 07:51:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I would politely beg to differ with him and point out that it was his city that was attacked and that his actions that day in 2001 are less than stellar. Hype only goes so far and then people find out the truth. Rudy will, if he hasn't already, be exposed.
2007-06-18 07:49:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
I would ask for his CV
and check his achievements and if possible a plan of action
2007-06-18 07:54:19 · answer #10 · answered by the orphan 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋