it is wonderful. They should ban smoking all together
2007-06-18 07:39:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by pancake on my face 5
·
4⤊
5⤋
Leslie G. - I live in Springfield, and there is a city-wide ban on smoking in public place. That is fine with me, but when they say that smoking is eliminated in private establishments (restaurants, bars., etc.) that's where it goes too far. It's not the gov'ments business to tell private businesses how they're going to run their business. If one doesn't like smoking in an establishment, then they don't have to go there. Let economics decide how they're going to run their business. (It's called the free enterprise system.) By the way, I'm a non-smoker. Have been all my life. Hate it. But not to the point that private businesses need to be told by the gov'ment how to run it.
2007-06-18 14:53:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am for the smoking ban.
The fact is it should be illegal to smoke, it doesnt just damage your body but others too.
My mother smoked while she was pregnant with my sister, but only like a pack a week.
My sister has terrible asthma and is in and out of the hospital all the time with pnuemonia, ear infections, etc. My sister has to go through all that by no choice of her own.
Thats what smokers put the public through.
I love to sing kareoke and I no longer can because even though there's a ban, they dont listen and so I cant go because my best friend has a brain hemmorhage and if she breathes in just a little smoke a few times it can cause her to stroke again.
So Im for the ban. Once it goes into affect that they'll be fined if they dont obey it, we'll finally be able to enjoy life.
And excuse me, but I take offense to the fact that you consider muslims to smokers. I am Jewish and often get singled out, and its very different. Smokers choose to slowly kill themselves for a few minutes of pleasure (basically a fix from drugs), whereas this is my religion and lifestyle, and its a positive healthy thing.
2007-06-18 14:48:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mikki Lynn Breisch 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
We will have a similar ban here in Minnesota, United States, starting on October 1. It will be good for those who work in places like bars, restaurants, or pubs, as they are not exposed to potentially dangerous second-hand smoke every day. It is almost a violation of the business owners right to privacy and freedom to make decisions that affect his/her business (not sure what kind of rights or freedoms are guaranteed in UK, but this could be considered a violation of the property rights here in the USA).
As with anything, there are pros and cons. Overall, I think it will be a good thing. People still can choose to smoke, they is only restrictions on where they can or cannot smoke.
2007-06-18 14:42:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think that private businesses should be allowed to declare themselves as "smoking" or "non-smoking" and let the customer choose which to patronize.
Next the big brother government will ban sugar or sushi.
2007-06-18 14:52:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sean 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with any ban of smoking anywhere outside your own home. You have the right to chose to smoke, but those of us subjected to second hand smoke are never asked if we'd like to breathe it. You should not be allowed to smoke outside your own home, where you and your family make the choice to shorten your lives.
2007-06-18 14:46:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chris 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
i have a very sad news to any one who thinks smoking is the only cause of dirty air or pollutions.
if we all gather all smokers who smoke from every where and put them on only one place, still the rest of you none smokers will breath toxic air.
so do not accuse us that we the smokers are the only ones who are responsible for the toxic air on the planet.
look around i am sure you all can find much more dangerous
fumes coming out of factory's, toxic waist planes and so on and on.
2007-06-18 14:55:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by not fair 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
i like the idea of a smoking ban in public places. people who choose not to smoke should not have to be in places where those who have chossen to smoke are. likewise with children, they cannot tell us that they don't want to be exposed to the smoke, and they haven't yet made their choice as to whether or not they will smoke.
i live in Canada and we have a smoking ban for public places, and any business.... theres been talk that they want to extend it to personal vehicles.... because of the kids thing
2007-06-18 14:43:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think that it is great. It is so much nicer now to go into a bar or even a restaurant or bowling alley and not walk out and smell like a big cigarette. I am not a smoker but I had friends that were and even they thought that it was a lot nicer. It is especially helpful for people that have bad Asama and can't be around smoke, not to mention how bad second hand smoke is for people to inhale. That passed in Washington before I moved and I loved it.
2007-06-18 14:40:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by littleone 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
It's just another freedom lost. Non smokers love it - but wait until there are laws forbidding them to walk their dog on city streets or drink coffee!
For the record, I don't smoke!
2007-06-18 14:46:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sweetkat 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure what your smoking ban involves...but in the state of Maine, smoking is not allowed in any public buildings, including bars. It's so nice not to have to sit in a restaraunt with that stench.
2007-06-18 14:40:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by xsteelnuttzx 2
·
2⤊
3⤋