English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

castration does not stop a pedophile it simply makes the pedophile more imaginative. They are incurable, and need to be separated from those they would hurt permanently.
I'd like to see them sent to an island somewhere so they could prey upon each other and not our children.

2007-06-18 07:40:28 · answer #1 · answered by essentiallysolo 7 · 2 1

Yes! Castrate first and then give an anaesthetic overdose the next day.

2007-06-18 15:05:41 · answer #2 · answered by Stanley M 1 · 0 1

Castrating them will not prevent abuse. A penis is only one thing they use to abuse children. Paedophiles should not be allowed to live in society. They should be locked away for life, or better still put to sleep

2007-06-18 15:14:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Impossible to reverse the exercise when it's discovered that the guy was innocent. after an initial guilty verdict.

It would seem appropriate that in those cases where the accused is actually found not guilty, an female accusers or witnesses for the prosecution should automatically have radical mastectomies, radical vulvectomy, hysterectomy and oophorectomy which would leave them in roughly the same position as their intended victim.

2007-06-18 20:18:26 · answer #4 · answered by Feinschmecker 6 · 1 1

This probably wouldn't cure them. But it would be a good start!
I don't think we'd succeed in getting this accepted as a legal punishment.
But from what I understand, the STOCKS are still on the statute books. Bring them back.
Lock a guy in the stocks, perhaps in the middle of Hyde Park. Put a sign around hs neck stating his crime, have 1 policeman on duty to ensure no-one kills him. Leave him there for the duration of his 48 hour sentence.
Advantages
Saves on prison costs.
The felon is cured - would you do it again?

Disadvantages
Prison guards would lose their overtime.

2007-06-18 15:08:04 · answer #5 · answered by des r 3 · 0 2

No, I don't believe in needless cruelty. They should be seperated from those they may harm, or if necessary put down like any crazed animal, dispassionately and without malice.

Justice should serve the good of people and society, not the darker impulses of armchair sadists getting a thrill out of the suffering of another living being and patting themselves on the back for their own righteousness the whole time.

2007-06-18 15:04:39 · answer #6 · answered by Somes J 5 · 1 3

I think you'd have to do it physically.
I know i certainly haven't mastered the art of mental telepathic castration yet, have you?

2007-06-18 14:41:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'll hand you the scalpel, you do the first one...
do you think killers should be skinned alive without anaesthetic and then eaten alive by ants ?, would you like to watch, if yes why, if not why not ? would you volunteer to skin them ?
pedophilia is an unspeakable, hideous, unforgiveable crime, what makes us different form the pedophiles is how we treat them...
the true measure of a great society is how it treats its lowest and most despicable citizens...

2007-06-18 14:42:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No i don't believe paedophiles deserve to have a life with or without their genitals! they should be given a lethal injection and simply removed from society.

2007-06-18 14:43:21 · answer #9 · answered by Kris P 1 · 0 1

What a bloodthirsty bunch.

Just how would you apologise when you've done it to the wrong bloke?

What would you do to women who also offend in this way? Since so many of you in favour of it were women, how would you ladies mutilate a female offender?

2007-06-18 19:12:27 · answer #10 · answered by davidifyouknowme 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers