2007-06-18 07:29:35 · 18 answers · asked by barley 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Agree!
2007-06-18 07:31:36 · answer #1 · answered by gypsy g 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree
2007-06-18 07:32:22 · answer #2 · answered by Nico 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Facts first, then my opinion. :) Fact: I've known lots of priests and they were almost all like these incredible love factories. They exuded love and it kind of shone from their faces. To say priests who don't have sex or relationships with one significant other are doing without love, just isn't true. I've known many priests who loved many many women (and men) very deeply. It just wasn't the "eros" kind of love between married spouses. My opinion: The Holy Spirit will continue to move through the Church, and this will at some point in the future change, to allow priests to get married. The only reason they ever started enforcing celibacy was back in the Middle Ages, when the Church was mainly political and very corrupt, nepotism was rampant: Priests amassing wealth via their Church offices, and passing it down (illegally, if necessary) to their sons, grandsons, etc. Mandatory celibacy for priests is a stop-gap measure that has outlived its purpose, so it should be rescinded. That won't happen with this uber-conservative Pope, though. But I hope and pray for the well being of the Church that it does happen.
2016-05-18 22:20:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, but at the sometime disagree because maybe the two people are still in love. They just have gone over the part of thinking that they have to show their love all the time. They have gotten so comfortable with one another that the love is there, but they are not seeing it. All it takes is for one to believe that there is no love there and everything could fall apart. Look out cause your entire life could change for the worst. Try to look at everything you have and look him in the eye...can you honestly say that you do love him and that he doesn't love you?
2007-06-20 18:34:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree! Look at Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn. They've been together for so long without getting married. And then look at Britney Spears in Vegas. She got married but clearly wasn't in love. Don't know if you can call that a marriage though. Only example that came to me. =-)
2007-06-18 07:34:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Disagree, marriage is the result of love, so if there is love there is marriage
2007-06-18 07:39:53 · answer #6 · answered by p_s_y_c_h_o_n_e_u_r_o_t_i_c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marriage should always be with love. I don't quite get what you mean when you say "love w/o marriage", though.
2007-06-18 07:33:03 · answer #7 · answered by ♥☺ bratiskim∞! ☺♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, of course. Usually love is a precursor to marriage.
2007-06-18 07:33:18 · answer #8 · answered by casey_leftwich 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely agree, at least 100%.
2007-06-18 08:05:33 · answer #9 · answered by gimpalomg 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know some people that have been together for like 10 years and haven't gotten married. I feel that it is their decision but also it makes me mad. It seems like they aren't really feeling that their relationship is important enough to be married. I think it's bullshit.
2007-06-18 07:36:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anne Lynn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋