Should Israel get out of the way of Palestine, so that their is one Palestinian State?

Question

And do you trust Condi Rice who is involved in this issue?

The French and the English have a lot to do with what happened prior to 1967, and the United States came about with England in 1967 when Palestinian land was seized to give Jews a haven from ridicule in Europe. They stole land and misplaced Palestinians in todays comprehension of the facts.


It seems likely that the United States would want to pay favor to the truth, and to let go of the bully-effect that Israel seems to want us to pay homage to. The Bible has nothing to do with what happened here, and God did not do this either. The Jewish ploy to take someone elses property for FREE is the issue, and it is time they pay for this act of injustice with justice.

Answer 1

First off, nothing stopped the other Arab states from creating a Palestinian state before 1967.

Israel did not occupy the land and had no say in the matter. The fact that from 1948-1967 when Egypt and Jordan controlled the area. Not a single attempt was made to create a Palestinian state.


Additionally Jews did not steal anyone elses property. The state of Israel was mandated by England who owned the land though the UN. They also mandated a Palestinian state. If the Arab world had allowed for their to be a Jewish state, instead of declaring war in 1948 then none of the past 60 years of conflict would have happened.

As long as one side dose not accept your right to exist how can you possibly have peace with them?

Answer 2

No...Israel exists now and there is nothing to do about it except accept it...But Israel has to accept Palestinians right to an independent state.All Israel would have to do is respect international law and withdraw to the borders from 1967...There can be two states there and ,right now this would be the best solution...Unfortunately it seems Israel is not ready for peace...
And I don't trust Rice on anything...

Answer 3

to function to what Churro stated, a sovereign state has the the main suitable option to be sure who's allowed back into its borders and develop into an immigrant or citizen. hence, assuming there replaced right into a 2 state answer which led to a state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel (it won't certainly ensue every time quickly), then that state could be allowed to allow in whomever they wanted. although, the different area is likewise actual. it is, Israel has the the main suitable option to be sure who's allowed back into its borders as properly. yet, it is the place the regulations of excellent judgment start to interrupt down.

Answer 4

Israel has been ordered repeatedly, by the UN, starting in 1967 to get off the lands they stole via military conquest...because they are in direct violation of international law...but Israel refuses...because the United States tells Israel they don't have to worry about UN resolutions...... as long as we've got their back they can keep up the apartheid

Answer 5

Israel is not going to do that so the issue is moot.

It looks like Palestine is collapsing and destroying itself anyways. It was a bad idea to give them that land to begin with. 8)

Answer 6

I believe that the eastern powers that started this mess(United Nations) should purchase land from eygpt or saudi and give palestine that. But Mainly The US, UK, Allies from WWII need to fix it before more innocent people are killed

Answer 7

Palestine has the same right to exit is this hard for the Zionist to understand.

Answer 8

yes
no
it would have made more sense and saved a lot of trouble/lives,if Israel and the US had never demanded elections

Answer 9

Israel was give n to the Jews by God. It is rightfully theirs and woe to anyone who doesn't support them. And Condy Rice is doing okay, as long as she doesn't try to give away any of their land.

Answer 10

The answer is no. Israel has a right to exist.