English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A. Plagiarist C. Résumé padder
B. Whistle-blower D. Salami shaver

2007-06-18 07:06:07 · 5 answers · asked by Marvelous_duh 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

plagiarists are unethical by themselves

resume padders are unethical but trying to survive a difficult moment in our employment environment

whistle blowers are highly ethical and are probably then the target of the unethical, whom they are outing

salami shavers should cut it thin, and serve with mayo

2007-06-18 07:09:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Though I don't know the term salami shaver but sounds racist, I would say that a plagarist would be more likely to retaliate since they have already shown poor ethics. A whistle blower might retaliate if you, too, have broken some rule or policy but less likely since they would be seen in a different light, that is a disgruntled person who cannot get along with others. And a person who pads their resume may eventually be "caught" but because they were unable to do the job requirements due to lack of experience.

2007-06-18 07:12:54 · answer #2 · answered by banananose_89117 7 · 0 0

Hey Girl...............You know, it's really tite, the Plagiarist, or the Whistle Blower, who's probably been hit by now, two in back of the head. That would be the most extreme situation.I'll go with the Plagiarist.............LATER........

2007-06-18 07:27:34 · answer #3 · answered by veteranpainter 4 · 0 0

i think the whistle blower, because he breaks the ring of corruption and/or unethical behavior.

2007-06-18 07:16:45 · answer #4 · answered by angelsantana197 2 · 0 0

Duh, I wonder. ;-)

2007-06-18 07:09:06 · answer #5 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers