It makes about as much sense as giving Bush credit for there not having been a terror attack since 9/11. Regardless of your political affiliation, it is ALWAYS impossible to prove a negative. And saying that because we have not had a terror attack since 9/11, Bush's war on terror is working, IS TRYING TO PROVE A NEGATIVE. silly wannabe cons!
2007-06-18 07:00:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hi anti earthquake policy was designed so he could stay in office.
After stealing 2 national elections, and lying to the public about IRAQ and who knows what else, anyone would be better than BUSH. Hey, I'd even vote for NIXON again if he were still alive. (and I normally vote democratic).
2007-06-18 07:27:51 · answer #1 · answered by Daniel R. 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Impossible to prove a negative? How about 0-1= -1 How about 2 x -1= -2 not that hard to prove at all.
Now as far as Bush goes. Yes, his anti-earth quake policy is working, prove it isn't. Without an earthquake you haven't a fault to stand on.
2007-06-18 14:11:29 · answer #2 · answered by grinslinger 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't know, but I do know there have been a number of terror attacks foiled and people arrested since 9/11 here in the US. The most recent , the planned attack in New Jersey on the military base.
2007-06-18 14:05:37 · answer #3 · answered by booman17 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The reason we havent had any terrorist attacks are 1) The terrorists are not planning any really elaborate ones right now because they know we have our guard up.
2) Remember, these terrorists all want to kill Americans and "get martyred." With the Iraq war they dont have to travel too far to do that. One effect of the Iraq war is that it is keeping the terrorists over there and only our own "homegrown" terrorists to try and blow crap up here.
Also, we are actively and openly hunting terrorists, not like we did under Clinton. I am not supporting Bush, but it is easy to plan elaborate attacks when no one is bugging you, as was Osama's case.
2007-06-18 14:23:26 · answer #4 · answered by DAVIDRZR 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there have been terrorist attacks since 9/11....they got little coverage though...counterpoint is that the demorats haven't done much since 9/11 to prevent more attacks other than side with terrorists and al qaeda saying we're losing etc...giving aid and comfort to our enemies during a time of war is treason....figure it out.
2007-06-18 14:04:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
so what are you saying
oboommmmma
can make a diference
anything anti bush is good ?
2007-06-18 14:03:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋