when schools dont allow students to say things does that break the rights of freedom of speech?

Answer 1

It's called being responsible and courteous! We have to remember that our rights end where the next person's begin. Just because Mr. J wants to say something, he doesn't have the right to say it when Mr. M has the right to not to have to hear it. We forget about the rights of others and only think of ourselves, that is why there are problems like in this hypothetical. Selfishness, thinking our rights are more important than any one else. That is wrong. Abraham Lincoln wrote an entire speech declaring that we are all equal. It is too easily forgotten.

Answer 2

At NO point in time has ANY American had the right of completely unrestricted speech. This is a misinterpretation of the constitution. From the very beginning, some speech acts have been criminal, and therefore not even vaguely free. This is not likely to change.

Minors have even less freedom than adults. This is the way it SHOULD be. Is it fair to give those with lesser judgement the same leeway as those with more? Hardly. Most states even have in place ways of removing 'minor' status from anyone who can demonstrate they deserve it. So it's not like there isn't even an appeal available.

As to whether any particular act of speech should or should not be allowed... you'll have to get more specific. You're going to have a hard time convincing me that students should be allowed to threaten, slander, and otherwise damage other people, no matter how attached you are to the idea of free speech. Again, even adults are not permitted this!

Answer 3

My sentiments are similar to Dr. Y's. I've always stated that freedom is an unattainable notion, what society really tries to accomplish is less intrusiveness on thoughts and actions while trying to protect everyone from undesirable outcomes. The fight is always over where to draw the line between a personal "freedom" becoming a destructive action. More authoritative action is taken in school because of administrators strive to protect everyone and stop things like riots and after school fights. Sometimes they go a bit too far and then we enter the public dialog over what should be considered harmful, but the main point is that the student's "freedom" is not the real issue. Expression can be exercised outside of the confides of school authoritarian rules when the last class bell rings

Answer 4

NO. Nothing in the constitution says one can say ANYthing, ANYwhere, at ANYtime. We all have restrictions on speech, but not many.

With students, young ones especially (high school and younger), restricting speech is a very good idea...up to a point. Students should be allowed to expressed any considered opinions that they wish to explore. Period. However, young kids are often just spouting emotional nonsense about something because they're angry at someone (or whatever), or just looking for an excuse to use foul language. Neither of these will serve them in adult life, so learning some restraint is a worthwhile lesson.

Make sense?

Answer 5

Technically, yes, but legally, no. Since students are minors, they are not legally protected by freedom of speech. The parents can defend their kid if they feel their rights were violated, but usually there is a reason behind the ruling. If what was said was inappropriate, disrespectful, terroristic, racist, or in some way bad, the teachers have the right to discipline the student. Anything else can be fought, but only by the parents. Sucks, but it's true.

Answer 6

No, because some speech can violate other people's constitutional rights. A school also has its own set of rules that are established to create a safe environment for others. You can be home schooled, just drop out or get expelled if you don't want to follow those rules. Education is actually a right and is only perceived as something negative by dysfunctional or anti-social individuals. Suggesting that "forced" public education is unconstitutional is ridiculous because of the other legal options available to people.

Answer 7

Believe it or not people do NOT have absolute freedom of speech. And example that the supreme court (of USA) drew out was somebody yelling out "FIRE" in a crowded theater. The possible injury caused by chaos and panic (public safety) out weights the persons rights to freedom of speech.

Just think if a President of the USA was speaking and you decided that you will stand up and protest. You will be pulled out of the room. And the same within your own classroom.

Even though young people have less rights (like limitation on driving, drinking, fire arms, sex, etc.) often you still have the same rights if you are formally protesting your school's view (meaning marching). But if you just want to speak out and dress differently, most likely you can't verbally express what is it you want to express or change (in the system) and you will probably be suppressed.

Answer 8

Nope--students who are under 18 aren't full citizens, thus the Bill of Rights is subject to interpretation. Naturally, this doesn't mean that those under 18 have no rights--just modified ones.

Answer 9

in case you published issues on facebook, your privateness has no longer been invaded. there is not any expectation of privateness on a public internet site like facebook. every person can get entry to something you assert and submit it or use it in any style they want. you have the liberty to assert regardless of you want, however the college probable has the means to punish you for particular habit outdoors of faculty. How is she making up lies if she is repeating your very own words? in step with probability you're a 13-twelve months previous who would not have the adulthood to cope with being on the internet and utilising web content like facebook.

Answer 10

there is a time and a place for everything...and common sence is needed...is you are going around saying something that is disruptful to others at the same time is it ok for you to step on their rights....free speech is 100 % fine but there are times and places and situations where it is not needed....like profanity or insulting words...but if it is on a theroy or a concept it would be looked at differently